k1ll3rdr4g0n
join:2005-03-19
Homer Glen, IL
| reply to BIGMIKE
Re: 11,000 images?
People in another thread didn't believe me when I said the internet was for porn! (Legal non kiddie porn).
Anyone wanna a 1hr movie of tentacles doing you know what? 
But yeah this isn't possible, as there is just too many packets going over the network to where a computer/server just couldn't process it (maybe multiple "scanners", but still during peak usage it could become backloged with packets that need to be "inspected" especially if the user is using P2P).
Our law makers are so stupid though, they are just so thick. Lets say torrent packets are now allowed to be dropped, someone will come around with "Torrent v2" which allows you to use SSL....which no on can touch SSL decryption as it is a federal law saying its illegal to decrypt. And if you use SSL there is no way to determine if the packet it going to a web server or over P2P, especially if both are operating on port 80; because the information of what kind of packet it is, is encrypted. 256bit SSL encryption anyone? |
|
BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA
| reply to furlonium
»https://thepiratebay.org/
Bring The Porn 2.11
»https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5504 |
|
furlonium
Computer Over? Virus equals Very Yes?
join:2002-05-08
Bethlehem, PA | That was the statistic I remember reading yesterday - 0.0003% of the images on newsgroups were illegal. So hell, let's just inspect every packet to make sure nobody's doing anything wrong.
WSPTOTC? |
|
