| reply to fiberguy
Re: Wow, this is an awesome deal! Fiberguy you really put me to work.Please look at this link. C MICHAEL ARMSTRONG was the AT&T CEO from 1997 to nov.of 2002.look at paragraph 5.Find the new AT&Tcomcast at paragraph 3.Under terms of agreement find AT&T shareowners will own 56% of the new AT&Tcomcast and two paragraphs under that find as part of the agreement ARMSTRONG will serve as chairman. »www.corp.att.com/news/2001/12/19-435 . AND than this link »answers.com/topic/times-topics-c···rmstrong look at end of 1st paragraph under "career" HE was CEO/director of new AT&Tcomcast DID HE KNOW ABOUT NSA ? |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | BACKGROUND*
Brian L. Roberts has been President of Comcast Holdings Corp. since 1990 and serves as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Roberts has been Chief Executive Officer and President of Comcast Corp., since November 2002. He serves as Principal Executive Officer of Comcast Cable Communications LLC, the General Partner of Cable TV Fund 12-B LTD.; Cable TV Fund 12-C LTD.; Cable TV Fund 12-D LTD.; Cable TV Fund 14-A Ltd., and Cable TV Fund 14-B LTD. He serves as Vice President of Sural ...
Brian Roberts has been Chairman since 2004. The unit of AT&T that Comcast purchased was AT&T Broadband, not AT&T Corporation which is really SBC with the new name that was involved in the warrant less wiretapping that is being referred to.
And still, however, you're talking about a transport carrier, not the ILEC carrier that was AT&T Inc. (ie: ATT carrying calls for Comcast isn't really the issue.) |
|
| IF you read the link the CEO of AT&T (the guy you are upset with) who gave the "OK" to the N S A became the chairman of comcast in NOV>2002. COMCAST used AT&T for its internet & voice traffic (Do you think the chairman forgot about the NSA) The issue is local voice (a part of AT&T broadband) The IP address of a customer web page, e-mail, chat rooms,all info supplied by AT&T broadband,now part of comcast. Thats if any of this NSA thing is "TRUE". |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | What does a CEO of another company not involved have anything to do with this? The guy you are speaking about is NOT the CEO of the SBC, now ATT (Different company) that is being talked about. I never said I was upset with the guy you are talking about. You're on Mars while I'm on earth. Sorry.. I can't debate something with you when you're either somewhere else off topic, or.. |
|
| reply to Rob 23
The issue as i understand it (here on MARS)is the nsa intercepting voice,e-mail,web page views,chat-room communications from U.S.citizens. The only NSA room we know about was built by the old AT&T before the merger of AT&Tcomcast (NOV>2002) or the merger of AT&T/SBC (OCT.2005)The NSA rooms will be at international peering points (the NSA is foreign communications surveillance)peering points at AT&T-MCI-SPRINT. SBC-vz-Q-communications surveillance is domestic and is done by the FBI. SBC is in this because they now own part of the old AT&T--VERIZON because they now own MCI. |
|
