 MarkAWBarry WhitePremium join:2001-08-27 Canada kudos:16 | reply to Mele20
Re: Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 Update 10 - October 16, 200 said by Mele20:How come update says I have the latest version (ver 6 update 7)? If you had read the post just above yours you would of seen and i quote;
"For example, if a user has previously installed JRE 6u10 in the c:/Program Files/Java/jre6 directory, and now attempts to install JRE 6u14, the version 6u14 installer does not create a new directory. Instead, it updates the pre-existing c:/Program Files/Java/jre6 directory with the new 6u14 content. The user is left with the 6u14 JRE only. The 6u10 JRE no longer exists."
this will only now happen with this new JRE 6u10, in other words when Java comes out with a new update to this version you can update it with out having to remove the old one first.  -- It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.
Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter. |
|
 Mele20Premium join:2001-06-05 Hilo, HI kudos:4 | I did read that post. But I didn't understand it. And I don't understand your reply. Why is there an INTERNAL updater if it doesn't work? Doesn't the internal updater remove the earlier version? What is the internal updater for? Is it only there to tell you there is a new version available and to tell you to remove the old version (which usually is impossible to do) or what? It says I have the latest version. Supposedly, if I had allowed it it would fetch the new version and install it all silently. So, you have me totally confused.
I only have Java for MySpeed. Otherwise, I would not install it. I used Microsoft JVM until the first of this year. I find SunJava confusing, irritating and worthless (for me) except for certain speed tests. I have never needed any form of Java except for Java speedtests. So, if it is well known that the internal updater doesn't work, I wouldn't know that probably. -- "The same ferocity that our founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the internet. The stakes are the same: the survival of our Republic". Al Gore, The Assault on Reason |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Mele20:I did read that post. But I didn't understand it. And I don't understand your reply. Why is there an INTERNAL updater if it doesn't work? Doesn't the internal updater remove the earlier version? What is the internal updater for? Is it only there to tell you there is a new version available and to tell you to remove the old version (which usually is impossible to do) or what? It says I have the latest version. Supposedly, if I had allowed it it would fetch the new version and install it all silently. So, you have me totally confused. I only have Java for MySpeed. Otherwise, I would not install it. I used Microsoft JVM until the first of this year. I find SunJava confusing, irritating and worthless (for me) except for certain speed tests. I have never needed any form of Java except for Java speedtests. So, if it is well known that the internal updater doesn't work, I wouldn't know that probably. I agree that the install/uninstall stuff with SunJava has always been a mystery. I have found my own workaround - a. I don't have updates scheduled to check or download or install automatically [via the java control panel] b. I donwload the newest version to my computer to install later [offline] c. ONLY the latest version seems to uninstall the OLDer versions entirely d. Even with C above I had the cleanest install on the older XP where I completely uninstalled ALL Java versions completely before I did the OFFLINE install.
Just sharing what I've noted thru the years.
 -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 MarkAWBarry WhitePremium join:2001-08-27 Canada kudos:16 1 edit | reply to Mele20 Over the years people have been complaining that the java internal updater doesn't work which was right it doesn't work, but with this new JRE 6u10 update SunJava the makers of your "confusing, irritating and worthless" as you put it, claim that as of this update java will update via the internal updater and will remove and install any and all updates from now on. Now i hope that was clear enough for you to understand. -- It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.
Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter. |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Just for note: On XP I still had to remove old java versions add-ons from within the Java console set up before it ran corectly using ONLY the new dll's for speed testing for example  -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
|
|
 Mele20Premium join:2001-06-05 Hilo, HI kudos:4 | reply to MarkAW Thank you. Now I understand. As I said I used MSJVM all these years with one exception so I wasn't aware that the updater doesn't work but will from ver 6 update 10 on. |
|
 MarkAWBarry WhitePremium join:2001-08-27 Canada kudos:16 | reply to amysheehan said by amysheehan:Just for note: On XP I still had to remove old java versions add-ons from within the Java console set up before it ran corectly using ONLY the new dll's for speed testing for example I had to do all that as well, but from what i gather that will not be from now on if you have this update installed it will do all of that for you if and when Java does another up date. -- It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.
Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter. |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by MarkAW:said by amysheehan:Just for note: On XP I still had to remove old java versions add-ons from within the Java console set up before it ran corectly using ONLY the new dll's for speed testing for example I had to do all that as well, but from what i gather that will not be from now on if you have this update installed it will do all of that for you if and when Java does another up date. Side note: Just didn't want everyone thinking that IN GENERAL the new JRE did it for older versions automatically Until I removed the old add-ons the speed test applet was unable to load and java reported older versions confusing the 2 older versions and reporting them each 3 different times. Best bet for now - clean up the old unless it's the 9 release before doing 10 and expecting no leftovers  My 9 updated cleanly with Vista - not so with any XP updated with old remnants...  -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 Mele20Premium join:2001-06-05 Hilo, HI kudos:4 | reply to amysheehan Thank you Amy for your tips. I will try to follow them now that I understand about the installer.
The only time I used Sun Java in all the years I've had computers (until this year) was one year when I was using 98SE as my host OS. I was unable to fully uninstall previous Sun Java versions and could not get the current one to install. I'll never forget how Eric Howes (I can't recall his handle here) and R2 went to great lengths to help me. It was quite a battle to get those earlier versions removed from my machine. They were partially removed already and that was the problem when trying to remove what was left. After that experience, I just used MSJVM. I was so against Sun Java that when I bought a new computer with XP Pro SP1a on it, and Dell had installed Sun Java, that I was mad at Dell and removed it immediately and installed MSJVM.
So, this new version that supposedly will not allow old versions to partially stick around sounds great. But why all these years before Sun fixed this? -- "The same ferocity that our founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the internet. The stakes are the same: the survival of our Republic". Al Gore, The Assault on Reason |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Mele20:Thank you Amy for your tips. I will try to follow them now that I understand about the installer. The only time I used Sun Java in all the years I've had computers (until this year) was one year when I was using 98SE as my host OS. I was unable to fully uninstall previous Sun Java versions and could not get the current one to install. I'll never forget how Eric Howes (I can't recall his handle here) and R2  went to great lengths to help me.  It was quite a battle to get those earlier versions removed from my machine. They were partially removed already and that was the problem when trying to remove what was left. After that experience, I just used MSJVM. I was so against Sun Java that when I bought a new computer with XP Pro SP1a on it, and Dell had installed Sun Java, that I was mad at Dell and removed it immediately and installed MSJVM. So, this new version that supposedly will not allow old versions to partially stick around sounds great. But why all these years before Sun fixed this? Now I've found that in VISTA there were lots of remnants of the older JAVA still on this computer including in ADD/REMOVE so I went and removed all of them and started over offline install. I now think this new install STILL needs to be done AFTER removing the older versions first in order to be complete. I am going to try another 2 setups to see what happens as well. It more and more seems like a NEW install requires an UNINSTALL first of all versions and the NEW install OFFLINE for best results and cleanest install to prevent conflicts.
Ill let you know what I find happens.
 -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to MarkAW said by MarkAW:said by amysheehan:Just for note: On XP I still had to remove old java versions add-ons from within the Java console set up before it ran corectly using ONLY the new dll's for speed testing for example I had to do all that as well, but from what i gather that will not be from now on if you have this update installed it will do all of that for you if and when Java does another up date. Now I have found some glitches.
SEE: »Re: Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 Update 10 - October 16, 200
Best bet so far - remove all before new install - including folders etc throughout computer referencing JAVA Sorry -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 MarkAWBarry WhitePremium join:2001-08-27 Canada kudos:16 | Yeah but in my case i used JavaRa to remove all that was left over first before i installed this new version and all is fine on my end.
»Re: [Update] Java 6u10 |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by MarkAW:Yeah but in my case i used JavaRa to remove all that was left over first before i installed this new version and all is fine on my end. » Re: [Update] Java 6u10 For now I am going to recommend uninstall of all old versions again before Update 10 install. Hopefully that will make the FUTURE updates work as they should. If older versions are still installed on computers they are STILL vulnerable to malware as we have found in many cleanups. Best to get all the old OFF  -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 Mele20Premium join:2001-06-05 Hilo, HI kudos:4 | I had 1.6 and the current 1.7 in Add/Remove. I removed 1.6 and it appears successfully gone. I have 204 Java files on the computer to look through and while looking through them, I saw that Search had the 1.4 installer package listed in several locations but 1.4 was not in Add/Remove Programs. I removed the install folder from:
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application Data\{7148F0A6-6813-11D6-A77B-00B0D0142030}
and from C:\Documents and Settings\Default User\Local Settings\Application Data\{7148F0A6-6813-11D6-A77B-00B0D0142030}
and from C:\Documents and Settings\Marilyn\Local Settings\Application Data\{7148F0A6-6813-11D6-A77B-00B0D0142030}
and from C:\WINDOWS\system32\config\systemprofile\Local Settings\Application Data\ApplicationHistory
Then I found 1.5 also: C:\Documents and Settings\Marilyn\Local Settings\Application Data\{3248F0A6-6813-11D6-A77B-00B0D0150060} and removed the folder.
I think removing 1.6 is why Sun Java is again taking away the taskbar transparency. 1.6 was the first version that worked properly in this regard. 1.7 was working properly until I removed 1.6. So, quite frankly, I am sorry I saw this thread. Now I am back to MSJVM. I should not have removed anything or even tried to upgrade to 1.10. Java was working correctly until I read this thread.  -- "The same ferocity that our founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the internet. The stakes are the same: the survival of our Republic". Al Gore, The Assault on Reason |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| I directly downloaded the UPDATE 10 Went offline Uninstalled thru add/remove Ran windows installer cleanup
Rebooted Checked for any remnant folders and deleted
Ran the offline install file *KEEP in mind this was done 2 time -32 bit Vista and XP Pro
I've included some info and links I used. »cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enf···peFilter
Download Java SE Runtime Environment 6u10 First Customer Ship for Windows, Multi-language Choose Windows Offline Installation jre-6u10-windows-i586-p.exe 15.52 MB
If the normal uninstallation process (as mentioned above) fails, then please try Microsoft Windows Installer Cleanup Utility. This tool will ensure that all irrelevant Java Runtime Environment Microsoft Installer (msi) registries are removed. Detailed information and download is available at: »support.microsoft.com/default.as···s;290301
OR GO TO: Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 Update 10 »java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
The home java website still shows a very old release as the most current. I used the link provided by the OP for the most recent version download and chose my OS and offline before proceeding.
I found that old versions weren't removed on my Vista install and ran the installer cleanup utility and reinstalled For the subsequent installs I followed the steps above I listed and had no problems
 -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 owlynPremium,MVM join:2004-06-05 Newtown, PA | reply to Mele20 Run this »secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/online . It will give you the locations of all the old Java files. And other old programs as well. |
|