| reply to fiberguy
Re: Wow, this is an awesome deal! IF you read the link the CEO of AT&T (the guy you are upset with) who gave the "OK" to the N S A became the chairman of comcast in NOV>2002. COMCAST used AT&T for its internet & voice traffic (Do you think the chairman forgot about the NSA) The issue is local voice (a part of AT&T broadband) The IP address of a customer web page, e-mail, chat rooms,all info supplied by AT&T broadband,now part of comcast. Thats if any of this NSA thing is "TRUE". |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | What does a CEO of another company not involved have anything to do with this? The guy you are speaking about is NOT the CEO of the SBC, now ATT (Different company) that is being talked about. I never said I was upset with the guy you are talking about. You're on Mars while I'm on earth. Sorry.. I can't debate something with you when you're either somewhere else off topic, or.. |
|
| reply to Rob 23
The issue as i understand it (here on MARS)is the nsa intercepting voice,e-mail,web page views,chat-room communications from U.S.citizens. The only NSA room we know about was built by the old AT&T before the merger of AT&Tcomcast (NOV>2002) or the merger of AT&T/SBC (OCT.2005)The NSA rooms will be at international peering points (the NSA is foreign communications surveillance)peering points at AT&T-MCI-SPRINT. SBC-vz-Q-communications surveillance is domestic and is done by the FBI. SBC is in this because they now own part of the old AT&T--VERIZON because they now own MCI. |
|
