<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Not so fast in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21282768</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:14:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:14:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Not so fast</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21276524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : "Several tests were performed with DTV signals present in adjacent channels.  <br>These tests showed that in the presence of moderate-to-strong signals in a first adjacent  channel, the detection threshold sensitivity of all of the devices was severely impacted.  <br>For some of the devices, the degradation in the detection sensitivity was as much as 60- 70 dB.  <br>In some cases, the degradation was such that the detection threshold could not be measured.  <br>This could impact significantly the ability of the devices to reliably detect TV signals within stations&#146; service areas."<br><br>"In some instances, the Adaptrum, I2R, and Motorola (in sensing only mode) <br>devices incorrectly reported channels as unoccupied (available) when the <br>WSD was operated within a station&#146;s service contour and the signal was <br>viewable."<br><br>BTW, anyone who has seen what a mess the FCC database currently is has to wonder how well geo-location will work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21276524</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:22:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
