<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Still waiting here... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21283436</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:30:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:30:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Still waiting here...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21283436</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><b>iansltx</b></A> : $40 for 1.5/896? How about no...<br>$47 for 5/896? Not for me either...<br><br>I'm in a college town where people would value a decently high speed connection for a reasonable price. The only provider who offers such a connection here is Comcast IMO...aside from upload speed issues, Qwest here is not FTTN and I haven't definitively heard that they'll upgrade this area any time soon. I'd be willing to switch to the $57-a-month 12/896 Titanium plan or at least the 7/896 ADSL2+ mid-tier offering if Qwest offered it here, but they don't, so I use Comcast.<br><br>What's funny is that the $175 per customer upgrade cost could be recouped in about 18 months by that customer choosing the 12 Mbps tier over a lower one, or the 7 Mbps ADSL2+ tier over 1.5 over the course of 24 months or so. Or look at it this way: that $175 upgrade could actually bring more Qwest customers on board with a more expensive ADSL2+ plan, so at $57 per month you're looking at a dang quick ROI.<br><br>Why they're only aiming for 40% FTTN penetration I just don't know...in non-FTTN areas the price for DSL is high enough compared to cable that using the MSO instead of the telco gives extra speed at a minimal price increase. Not good for customer retention...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21283436</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:14:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
