 drewAutomaticPremium
join:2002-07-10
Port Orchard, WA
kudos:6
 ·wavebroadband
| reply to joako
Re: Reverse? Amen to that joako.
Sprint really irked me several times due to extending our contract on a line for replacing a phone with a previously purchased phone. How the hell is that even legal?
Scenario: I have phone A on line A. My wife has phone B on line B. I get a (new) phone C. Phone B was old and needed a new battery, so I gave Phone A to my wife. They extended lines A & B for another 2 years. Line A, yes, for the phone discount. Line B? What the hell. |
|
|
|
 joakoPremium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
·Comcast
| It's "legal" because you signed your life away in the contract.
They extended my contract without telling me.
I can't sue. I CAN pay for arbitration, which IMO is worthless.
Oh well contract is up in September and I am getting tired of a $160/mo bill and I still can't get the free text messaging they promised me.
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0 |
|
| Why don't you just change your plan? yeah you'd sign a new contract, but it would void your old one, and you can get better service. |
|
 BIGMIKEPremium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA | reply to joako
Sprint California early termination fees are illegal,
Californians fed up with being charged for ending their cell phone service prematurely won a major victory in a Bay Area court decision that concluded such fees violate state law.
»www.mercurynews.com/ci_10039461 |
|
joakoPremium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Gootie1865
said by Gootie1865 :
Why don't you just change your plan? yeah you'd sign a new contract, but it would void your old one, and you can get better service.
Because the reception isn´t too great either. Somehow they've also managed to have the same dead zones in Sprint (CDMA) and Nextel (iDEN) services.
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0 |
|
