| reply to dslwanter
Re: Wow... said by dslwanter:It's is a bunch of hord crap to offer monster speeds then expect people not to get download horny. If you're going to increase speeds you better increase that cap. Faster doesn't equal more.
--
Fighting on the Internet is like winning the Special Olympics. Win or lose, your still Retarted! |
|
pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
 ·Comcast
·ooma
| You make a point. At the same time, at 50 mb down and 10 mb up, how long does it take to break the 250 GB cap?
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." |
|
| reply to LeftOfSanity
That's true but with a faster connection you'll be more likely to download more than before, especially thinks like HD video. |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18
1 edit | said by kevinm5:That's true but with a faster connection you'll be more likely to download more than before, especially thinks like HD video. Likely, perhaps.
I went from 1.5mbps 5 years ago to 16mbps now and I still average 30GB per month.
Now, if I had 5mbps upload, my overal use would likely climb.
No way in hell I would get near 250GB per month though.
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
jca2050Premium
join:2002-02-04
Hacienda Heights, CA | reply to pandora
Assuming you are downloading at full speed, it will take about 11.1 hours of straight downloading to reach the cap |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Take this example:
Compare yourself as eating at a Restaurant and then at a Buffet. You order a meal from a menu or chose a buffet.
Either way, you can still only eat so much.. if you're over doing it at the buffet, that says something about your habits.
Most people don't gorge.. they simply get work done quicker or get what ever it was they were doing done quicker. |
|
|
|
| reply to dadkins
This cap may seem extreme to all of you average joe's. But look at the future and you will see that 250gb is literally nothing. New technologies are coming out that use large amounts of space. Services exist like downloading games over the internet, and online hard drives. The average joe is starting to buy terabyte hard drives. I believe comcast should base there cap limit on the hard drive market.
Most of you guys that defend comcast are the perfect stereotype of the average "american consumer". I'm really tired of having ignorant people make decisions that effect everybody else just because they want to be the average goody toe shoes. I really have no idea how someone would settle for such a low cap in the beginning. if your a smart individual and know how these companies work then you will soon be paying for your service by the gigabyte. Only then will you understand what the rest of us have been telling you for years, go ahead. Be a sucker. |
|
 espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
 ·Clear Wireless
| said by Underplay:I believe comcast should base there cap limit on the hard drive market. That's like saying people should develop their household spending budget based on how much stuff they can fit in their car.
There are real limits to how much traffic each network segment can deliver; the caps are derived from how much traffic it's possible to deliver, not by theoretical max consumption. |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to LeftOfSanity
said by LeftOfSanity:said by dslwanter:It's is a bunch of hord crap to offer monster speeds then expect people not to get download horny. If you're going to increase speeds you better increase that cap. Faster doesn't equal more. Correct!
faster just means you're at your caps quicker!
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee |
|
| reply to espaeth
Yes that was a bad comparison. Anyway, the point is that the low 250gb cap is shit. If comcast tried to screw us by charging us per gig then their going to get tossed in the long run. I hope they raise the limit with the new speeds. |
|
dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | said by Underplay:Yes that was a bad comparison. Anyway, the point is that the low 250gb cap is shit. If comcast tried to screw us by charging us per gig then their going to get tossed in the long run. I hope they raise the limit with the new speeds. Look at it from the majority's point of view...
Per GB would be great for 99% of Comcast subs.
Imagine me - 30GB per month. Lower my bill to $10.00 or less? SURE!
In time, that 250GB cap will need to be raised.
ATM it is far and beyond any other service that is being capped. 
Ok by me!
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
 pspcrazyAnime Freak
join:2008-02-06
San Diego, CA | reply to fiberguy
I hate when people use analogies for these things. There is no such as appetite in downloading. When I buy 50/10 I want to USE MORE, or else I'd stick with the slower 22/5. Most server don't even go that fast, so I'd expect no cap for that high cost top because that's the cost of business class imo. |
|
pspcrazyAnime Freak
join:2008-02-06
San Diego, CA | reply to dvd536
Yeah I find it funny that people here even defend caps at all. It's sad to see that in the forward moving world, we're actually moving backwards. Sad that people support that AT ALL. |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to pspcrazy
said by pspcrazy:I hate when people use analogies for these things. There is no such as appetite in downloading. When I buy 50/10 I want to USE MORE, or else I'd stick with the slower 22/5. Most server don't even go that fast, so I'd expect no cap for that high cost top because that's the cost of business class imo. Your analogy is equally as flawed. I (and most people) would purchase it to get the same amount of work done, but faster. And servers most definitely WILL go that fast, it's all about what you're doing. I can pull data from our rack to another server we have several states away at 70Mbps+, the limit of the drives in the destination server.
50Mbps isn't about using more, it's about getting your work done faster. Once people understand that, all this ruckus will die down.
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
·Comcast
·ooma
| said by Matt:50Mbps isn't about using more, it's about getting your work done faster. Once people understand that, all this ruckus will die down. I'm not so sure about that. I read an article the other day about Japan having a lot of very fast optical pipes but still being very congested. The conclusion was that speed doesn't solve the problem of congestion. More speed, results in greater use.
If this is true for other countries, I'd assume it is true for the united states. Utilization will increase with capacity. Comcast by providing greater capacity will generate greater utilization.
As a suggestion, take a look here - »www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Int···861.html
"[The congestion problems] wouldn't be solved by building a bigger pipe," Douglas said. "In Japan, where they have all-fiber networks and 100 megabits per second speeds, they are still experiencing heavy congestion. You can't build your way out of it."
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | As the article stated, there are going to be points of congestion where you have users who think their internet connection is all you can eat, or users who simply don't know any better.
On the whole, people just want things done faster.
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
·Comcast
·ooma
| Faster pipes = greater usage said by Matt:As the article stated, there are going to be points of congestion where you have users who think their internet connection is all you can eat, or users who simply don't know any better. On the whole, people just want things done faster. The point of the article is faster pipes result in more traffic.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by pandora:said by Matt:As the article stated, there are going to be points of congestion where you have users who think their internet connection is all you can eat, or users who simply don't know any better. On the whole, people just want things done faster. The point of the article is faster pipes result in more traffic. I didn't interpret it that way. But I guess you could if that's the point you're looking to make.
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
·Comcast
·ooma
| said by Matt:I didn't interpret it that way. But I guess you could if that's the point you're looking to make. Or you could just take the fact directly from the article without any need for interpretation. 
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." |
|
| any ETA on the "free" upgrade?
I'm thinking of switching to FIOS; perhaps, I can wait |
|
