 jefePremium
join:2001-05-19
Northport, NY | reply to dave
Re: [XP Pro] "irpstacksize" is too small.... They're back. The irpstacksize error messages, that is.
dave...in that KB article you linked to it mentioned the importance of using the right case. I used the case they showed. However, that KB article is about NT 4.0. In the WinXP Pro Help and Support Center page I get when I click on the link provided in the Event Viewer error it uses a different case.
The article you linked to:
IMPORTANT: Type "IRPStackSize" exactly as it is displayed because the value name is case-sensitive
The article the Event Viewer links to:
Using Regedit, open the following registry key:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\IrpStackSize
So should I be using IRP or Irp?
--jeff |
|
davePremium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:7 | Hmm, I'm not sure I believe it's case-sensitive. But still...
I'd try the one you didn't try before  |
|
jefePremium
join:2001-05-19
Northport, NY
1 edit | I was thinking along the same lines. I racheted the value up 5 to 20. If I still get the errors next thing will be to try the other case. |
|
|
|
Anon00Premium
join:2001-09-25
USA
kudos:1
2 edits | said by jefe:I was thinking along the same lines. I racheted the value up 5 to 20. If I still get the errors next thing will be to try the other case. 20 was my magic number. 15 didn't cut it, 18 didn't cut it so I tried 20 and nothing returned. I've done 25 with no noticeable ill-effects.
Of course in my case, IRPStacksize errors only occurred when trying to access Shares of a Computer (laptops). Not transferring, just accessing.
--
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." - Friedrich Nietzsche
"'It's the law' is just an excuse for the unintelligent and unimaginative to remain that way" - Me |
|
jefePremium
join:2001-05-19
Northport, NY | I've set IRPStacksize to 20. Good so far.
Just out of curiosity did you use IRPStacksize or IrpStacksize in your registry? |
|
Anon00Premium
join:2001-09-25
USA
kudos:1
2 edits | As dave suggested, it's doubtful it's case-sensitive.
I believe I've used variations, when doing it manually when the issue presented itself, of the entry to solve the issue, like IRPStackSize, IrpStackSize, irpstacksize. Think I copied the KB when I wrote a batch file to do this remotely.
Oh one more thing, make sure you power cycle like the KB says.
--
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." - Friedrich Nietzsche
"'It's the law' is just an excuse for the unintelligent and unimaginative to remain that way" - Me |
|
jefePremium
join:2001-05-19
Northport, NY | Well, it was the KB article that dave provided that indicated the case is senstive. But I have rebooted and we'll see if having the IRPStackSize set to 20 solves my problem. |
|
Anon00Premium
join:2001-09-25
USA
kudos:1
2 edits | said by jefe:Well, it was the KB article that dave provided that indicated the case is senstive. But I have rebooted and we'll see if having the IRPStackSize set to 20 solves my problem. Checked my work machine and I did write the entry as IRPStackSize.
I might have been doing it that way manually, just been like... 8 months since I wrote it out by hand.
PS Only used this on XP SP2 machines... doubtful that makes a difference.
--
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." - Friedrich Nietzsche
"'It's the law' is just an excuse for the unintelligent and unimaginative to remain that way" - Me |
|
