<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Mounting problems for Mediacom in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21313107</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:10:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:10:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Mounting problems for Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21313107</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/587125"><b>drslash</b></A> : Big Ten Mediacom markets were *blessed* with the BTN being added to the lineup whether the customer wanted it or not. The Mediacom argument against the BTN was choice for the customer...oops...backtrack...no choice. :( The technology changes over the last year to the video delivery has been a huge downgrade. The problems with the analog signal are numerous and annoying. This is a ticking time bomb for Mediacom in my community. A local cable provider is building out service to my area and surrounding areas. Gee...I'll have another choice besides DBS choices.<br><small>--<br>Save water...drink beer!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21313107</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:42:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
