<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: never a serious contender&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-never-a-serious-contender-21318831</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:43:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:43:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: never a serious contender</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-never-a-serious-contender-21322656</link>
<description><![CDATA[EG posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1429718" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1429718');">SierraRob</a>:</small><br><br>I don't understand why FCC needs BPL for this purpose, as they can always point to satellite "broadband", which covers 100% of the country. "See? Everyone has broadband! The free market rocks!"<br> </div>Ask the typical hardcore online gamer if satellite based "broadband" is their preferred solution..  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-never-a-serious-contender-21322656</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:01:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: never a serious contender</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-never-a-serious-contender-21319496</link>
<description><![CDATA[SierraRob posted : I don't understand why FCC needs BPL for this purpose, as they can always point to satellite "broadband", which covers 100% of the country. "See? Everyone has broadband! The free market rocks!"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-never-a-serious-contender-21319496</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:38:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>never a serious contender</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/never-a-serious-contender-21318831</link>
<description><![CDATA[nasadude posted : BPL was never a serious broadband alternative and was only pushed by the FCC for political reasons.<br><br>In that respect, it appears to have served it's purpose of masking the non-competitive nature of the U.S. broadband market and fooling congress into believing the FCC and incumbent's pronouncements of a "competitive market".<br><br>it didn't do so well at providing affordable broadband to the public.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/never-a-serious-contender-21318831</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:31:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

