knightdark0
join:2003-01-07 San Jose, CA | Google mail server down? I cannot login my dslx e-mail account. It complained that server cannot be found. Anyone seeing the same issue? | |
|
  81399672 Premium join:2006-05-17 Los Angeles, CA | Re: Google mail server down? it's working fine for me. | |
|
 |   Zak_D_H Premium,VIP join:2007-01-04 Salt Lake City, UT
·Qwest.net
| Re: Google mail server down? Hi knightdark0,
I am not aware of any problems with webmail at this time. I would recommend deleting your temporary internet files and auto-complete files and trying again. If you would like me to take a look at the account that is having the issue send me a PM with your account info.
Thanks, -- Zak
Tech Support
DSLExtreme
| |
|
 |
 knightdark0
join:2003-01-07 San Jose, CA | Re: Google mail server down? Looks like it is just an issue that I cannot access it from my office. It works fine when I access the e-mail at home using DSL. So it is not an issue on the google mail server. | |
|
 MTB
join:2007-06-29 Newport Beach, CA 2 edits | Same crap here. The port and/or mail.dslextreme.com is hosed. Gmail is working just fine. | |
|
 |   dslx_gm Premium,VIP join:2002-12-26 Winnetka, CA
| Re: Google mail server down? said by MTB :Same crap here. The port and/or mail.dslextreme.com is hosed. Gmail is working just fine. mail.dslextreme.com is not longer active. To access your email via a mail client you need to update your settings to pop.gmail.com. | |
|
 |  |  MTB
join:2007-06-29 Newport Beach, CA | Re: Google mail server down? Thanks for the good answer.
It would be easier for DSLX to setup an alias or DNS record to resolve the issue for everybody. | |
|
 |  |  |   dslx_gm Premium,VIP join:2002-12-26 Winnetka, CA
| Re: Google mail server down? That was our original plan which at a high level makes sense. Since mail.dslextreme.com isn't tied to the security certificates on the Google servers, every time a client hit send and receive, they would get a notice/error message. That was why the change was required. Thanks for the thought though. | |
|
 |
|
 |