republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cox: What Bandwidth Crunch? » Now comes with twice as many crap channels as before!
Search Topic:
 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Leave it to Cox  
AuthorAll Replies


Fubar

join:2001-02-20
Phoenix, AZ		reply to anonimuz
Re: Now comes with twice as many crap channels as before!

The attenuation that 3ghz signal would cause would require all plant to be rebuilt to compensate....

It' can get bad enough on a 750 plant I would hate to be at the end of a line on a 3ghz plant....
to forum · permalink · · 2008-10-25 17:28:38 · Reply to this

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

 Correct.

Now to another point. I think sometimes that people need to stop reading b2b press releases for their information. The 3ghz gear is trying to be pushed to gain sales. It's a pure business move of someone trying to hawk their gear. In the real world, as to where it means anything to the consumer, it's not being implemented because it's a huge mess for cable operators to implement. (as you said above)

This just brings us back to the "it works in the lab, but lets see it in the field" point.
to forum · permalink · · 2008-10-25 21:09:23 · Reply to this


Smokey
Even drunk on a bet ya make it to Canada
Premium
join:2003-05-20
Va Beach
clubs:		reply to Fubar
Wasn't Cox talking about deploying that on just a "few select" plant runs? Mainly bushiness areas to bring down the costs to service medium businesses?
--
Para Bellum!!
to forum · permalink · · 2008-10-28 00:23:57 · Reply to this


Fubar

join:2001-02-20
Phoenix, AZ
said by Smokey See Profile :

Wasn't Cox talking about deploying that on just a "few select" plant runs? Mainly bushiness areas to bring down the costs to service medium businesses?
3ghz? Not that I ever heard...
to forum · permalink · · 2008-10-29 00:45:02 · Reply to this
-
Forums » Cox: What Bandwidth Crunch?« Leave it to Cox  

Friday, 04-Dec 22:59:07 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [69] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· [Unlock] TUTORIAL: VONAGE WRTP54G/RTP300 WITH 5.01.04 [VOIP Tech Chat]