<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints in Sports Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21327427</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21343711</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956696"><b>rody_44</b></A> :  worked for me. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21343711</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:38:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21328439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/651429"><b>pro7070</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  rockotman <A HREF="/useremail/u/181343"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So testing positive for a diuretic that can act as a mask for 'roids is now equivalent to testing positive for 'rods?<br><br>Yeah, they may be guilty, but I have a big problem with assuming guilt based upon detecting a substance that can act as a possible masking agent when that substance also has other medicinal purposes.<br> </div>It' on the banned substance list.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21328439</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:45:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21327747</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/316004"><b>Bolt Pride</b></A> : <b>Bumetanide</b> is on the <A HREF="http://www.prostaronline.com/bannedsubstances.html">NFL's Banned Substance List.</a> <br><small>--<br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21327747</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:39:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21327427</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Yeah, it's a slippery slope. It's like punishing people for (real or imagined) intentions, rather than actual acts. There's too much of that going on. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.istapledmycat.com/pics/dickcream/whenimoveyoumove.swf">relax</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21327427</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:38:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21326644</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/550602"><b>CtrlAltDel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  rockotman <A HREF="/useremail/u/181343"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So testing positive for a diuretic that can act as a mask for 'roids is now equivalent to testing positive for 'rods?<br><br>Yeah, they may be guilty, but I have a big problem with assuming guilt based upon detecting a substance that can act as a possible masking agent when that substance also has other medicinal purposes.<br> </div>There is an herb called Goldenseal which has many beneficial uses. People thought that taking Goldenseal before a drug test would mask any drugs in their system. Employers became aware of this and began testing for Goldenseal along with the tests for illicit drugs and if you had Goldenseal in your system you were deemed to be attempting to mask your drug use. This kept Goldenseal users from acquiring jobs although Goldenseal is used for other purposes and does not mask drug usage. Go figure. :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21326644</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:57:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324862</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/181343"><b>rockotman</b></A> : So testing positive for a diuretic that can act as a mask for 'roids is now equivalent to testing positive for 'rods?<br><br>Yeah, they may be guilty, but I have a big problem with assuming guilt based upon detecting a substance that can act as a possible masking agent when that substance also has other medicinal purposes.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://mywebpages.comcast.net/rockotman/peasy.mp3">"I was the bad guy once again. I laughed at their sorrows.  Ha ha ha ha ha."  </a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324862</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:00:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324095</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/446518"><b>RWoods</b></A> : Guess the Saints are passing the needle...both starting DEs are gone. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324095</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:36:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/651429"><b>pro7070</b></A> : ESPN reported last night that up to 16 players League wide were caught.<br><br>Guess they sprang a new test on them or something. IMO, probably 50% of the league is on something. And that's probably a conservative guess. They just don't test everybody at once.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21324040</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:22:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/525472"><b>Eagles LoveR</b></A> : so thats why no1 can tackle deuce ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323989</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:08:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[NFL] Sources: NFL&#x27;s failed doping tests involve 3 Saints</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/808988"><b>weiser</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3661845" >sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3661845</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323614</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:31:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
