<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: wow in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21333007</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:45:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:45:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21340802</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Does it really matter? If CenturyTel does keep the CenturyTel name, they'll surely have to launch a public image campaign. (Even if they keep the Embarq name I wouldn't be surprised if they introduced a new logo to go with it) When Verizon introduced their new name out of nowhere without any history they wiped out two semi well-known names (Bell Atlantic and GTE), but today everyone knows who they are. Would it have made more sense to keep Bell Atlantic or GTE as the name?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21340802</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:33:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21339565</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243222"><b>NickD</b></A> : So will people's high speed internet still cost $24.95 up to the year 2525, like their commercial said.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21339565</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:07:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21337877</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/402245"><b>AlexNYC</b></A> : Hummm ...  :D In my area CenturyHell offers an oversubscribed 1.5 Mbps DSL for $41.20 a month. It's like a time machine that takes you 15 years back with pocket loss and crappy customer service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21337877</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:24:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21337802</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1555838"><b>jezme</b></A> : then you must be in an area where they have competition. we pay $35/month for 1.5/256 in places where they can get away with it because they are the only phone co and the only ISP then that can offer DSL...... they have no competition and they know it. I have friends getting 10mb service for what I pay for 1.5, but they live where there are competitors.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21337802</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:10:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21336376</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376775"><b>Fox McCloud</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  EPS <A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>While Embarq shareholders will own a majority the entity, it looks like at least most of the CenturyTel board of directors will keep their jobs and will run the merged company, not Embarq's. One wonders how the merged entity will be branded.<br> </div>they'd be smart to keep the Embarq name--at least <i>some</i> of America knows the name "Embarq" because it's the largest independent telco, but CenturyTel? Not only is the name cheesy, but no-one has ever heard of it before.<br><br>It's like when SBC kept getting bigger and bigger...it made more sense to keep the name AT&T than to continue being called "SBC".....let's just hope CenturyTel is that smart.<br><small>--<br>"True Patriotism is more closely linked with dissent than it is to conformity and a blind desire for safety and security...I accept the definition of patriotism as that effort to resist abusive state power."  -Ron Paul</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21336376</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:41:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334944</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/421234"><b>ArkiMage</b></A> : Yeah, was surprised to see Centurytel "buying" Embarq but Embarq ending up owning >50% of the combined company. Sure seems the other way around.<br><br>But then there is a history of this sort of thing with them. In the early 90's United Telephone bought Sprint and decided to keep the Sprint name afterwards because it had more brand recognition. Embarq was later spun off from that.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFDA103CF93BA25757C0A966958260" >query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h&middot;&middot;&middot;66958260</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334944</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:57:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334396</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1587675"><b>Smile__</b></A> : Yeah! The slowest of 3G Aircards on the market.. Oh wait forgot Tmo...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334396</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:17:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/703018"><b>Eek2121</b></A> : Umm?  Turd?  Embarq? You are using AT&T wireless and you call embarq a turd?  Hate to break it to ya buddy, 10mbit internet here + satellite + long distance, $99/mo.  Sounds pretty damn competitive to me?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21334382</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:14:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21333007</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><b>Cheese</b></A> : CentBarq]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21333007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:23:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1032716"><b>dcurrey</b></A> : BarqTel<br>TeleBarq]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332448</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:42:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : While Embarq shareholders will own a majority the entity, it looks like at least most of the CenturyTel board of directors will keep their jobs and will run the merged company, not Embarq's. One wonders how the merged entity will be branded.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332375</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:28:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332369</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855954"><b>tstolze</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  iansltx <A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Upon relfection, Embarq owning the majority of the company is a good thing. Their speeds are at least decent across the footprint, and the company won't be fiber-phobic.<br> </div>Centurytel is running FTTH in new developments, along with rumor of some testing of FTTH in older service areas<br><small>--<br> <A HREF="http://tstolze.net">Ofallon, Mo Weather</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332369</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332344</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><b>iansltx</b></A> : Upon relfection, Embarq owning the majority of the company is a good thing. Their speeds are at least decent across the footprint, and the company won't be fiber-phobic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332344</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:23:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/416162"><b>GeekJedi</b></A> : Hmmm,  I pay $40 for 10mbps from CTL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332194</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:52:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332131</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1587675"><b>Smile__</b></A> : XOHM willnt fail.. Besides there is a merger in the making with Clearwire... Remember? Should be done by year end.. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332131</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:39:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  S_engineer <A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Didn't know centurytel had that kind of money....seems to me if they waited a little longer, like after XOHM fails, they'd get it cheaper.<br> </div>It looks like Centurytel is buying Embarq, but when you look at who will own the combined company, it is really Embarq taking over CenturyTel.<br><br><div class="bquote">after closing Embarq shareholders are expected to own about 66 percent of the combined company.<br></div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332098</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:33:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/910659"><b>inteller</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  S_engineer <A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Didn't know centurytel had that kind of money....seems to me if they waited a little longer, like after XOHM fails, they'd get it cheaper.<br> </div>hey, when you charge people $30-40 for 1.5mbps DSL YOU TOO can hoarde back a lot of money to go buy failed companies.<br><br>This merger won't happen.  Once the dems take office FCC is going to get shitty.  The corporate ecosystem has been perverted far too long by letting these mergers happen while the debt is just shifted around.  Let that turd Embarq go under and let other companies buy up the pieces they want.  That is how real competition happens.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332064</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:26:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332024</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1032716"><b>dcurrey</b></A> : Embarq doesn't have anything to do with XOHM.  Sprint is the one with XOHM.  They are separate companies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332024</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:17:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332006</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : Didn't know centurytel had that kind of money....seems to me if they waited a little longer, like after XOHM fails, they'd get it cheaper.<br><small>--<br>"For duty and humanity!"<br>- Moe Larry and Curly (MEN IN BLACK, 1934)...These are the guys we have in Congress</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21332006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:13:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
