Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cellphone Inventor Knocks Carriers, Smart Phones » Feh, meh, and piffle
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
39
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
A different version of protectionism, that's all »
« Damn Skippy  
AuthorAll Replies


mikeurl

join:2002-06-26
Whitestone, NY

Feh, meh, and piffle

I have little to no use for mobile computing. I carry a cell phone, off usually, for emergency purposes and I have the cheapest plan I can find.

If you had told him 48 years that everyone in the country would be able to have a cell phone the size of a credit card with a 10 day standby time for 20 bux a month he probably would have thought that was pretty good.

However, he is right in the sense that I won't tough the more complicated phones because they are all locked down steaming piles of fail. I don't like proprietary systems that proscribe what I can do with hardware I OWN. To the extent possible the technology should be open and interoperable with all networks. But since it isn't all I pay for is the ability to make phone calls (which, by the way, IS an open standard that is interoperable with all other phones).


ArgMeMatey

join:2001-08-09
Milwaukee, WI
·AT&T Midwest

said by mikeurl See Profile :

...I don't like proprietary systems that proscribe what I can do with hardware I OWN.
That's a good principle. But a lot of people don't realize that they don't really "own" the phone until their initial contract term is up. (OK, well, I do own the phone but the company will write the contract to make sure I have no right to demand anything from them.) However once the term expires, no subsidy code should be required to get into the programming mode.

I want options! I want to bring my own damn phone, pay for my phone up front, or have it listed as a line item for x months on my bill. Discount for doing a 5-year contract? Pay more for month-to-month? No problem.

What it comes down to is two opposing ideas: Bundles give me more features, many of which I don't need or want, but that ensures consistent revenue for the provider. A la carte would cost me less but would undermine profits for the carrier.

The consumer's nirvana is a bill that itemizes all optional charges and none of the mandatory ones. Unfortunately carriers create the bills, so they bundle all the optional stuff to make sure you can't shave their profits, and they itemize the "taxes" to make government look like the villain. (Government may be a villain, but that's beside the point.)
--
USNG:
16TDN2870
Find your Lat-Long:
Geocoder
-
Forums » Cellphone Inventor Knocks Carriers, Smart PhonesA different version of protectionism, that's all »
« Damn Skippy  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 00:58:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [83] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [51] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [25] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [12] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [11] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]