 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | Weird How was the original ETF language in the contract misleading? If Sprint's is like other carriers then it is crystal clear.
--
"At the moment of conception." |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | said by pnh102:How was the original ETF language in the contract misleading? If Sprint's is like other carriers then it is crystal clear. Because people want their cake and to eat it too.
People are not stupid, and its very clear by reading these forums. However, people have chosen to play ignorant so they can bilk the provider from money. (And people wonder why rates are up the uptake?)
People come here all the time talking about the ETF and how to get their service for less, at the promo rates, and NOT have to get into the contract. So, when a chance comes by to say that the ETF fee is unclear, they sue.
I will say, too, that what the providers did WAS in-fact borderline criminal when they extended contracts with out telling customers their agreements were being extended, to which I agree they NEED to pay back their ill-gotten gains.
But, if any suit is based solely on the fact that ETF's exist, why bother.. simply vote socialism into office and most of these lawsuits will go away. |
|
 BIGMIKEPremium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA | reply to pnh102
said by pnh102:How was the original ETF language in the contract misleading? If Sprint's is like other carriers then it is crystal clear. Under California lawSprint Termination Fees are Illegal, Sprint Ordered to Pay Millions in Early Termination Fee Flap »blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/0···red.html |
|
|
|
