approval from:
CanadianIron 
| reply to fourboxers
Re: Trick or Treat - CRTC Decision So I filed a complaint with the CRTC:
I said this:
Hi,
This is in regards to the CAIP vs Bell filing found at »www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/···5153.htm, 2008-04-03 - #: 8622-C51-200805153 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) - Application requesting certain orders directing Bell Canada to cease and desist from throttling its wholesale ADSL Access Services
The CRTC said they would rule on the matter by October 31, 2008. So far there is no ruling on the CRTC website.
In addition to this, I came across a CBC news report that said the CRTC has delayed its Oct. 31st deadline. I do not see this date ammendment anywhere on the above mentioned CRTC website.
Per this Commission letter: »www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Lette···808c.htm
"It is noted that the Commission expects to issue a final determination by 31 October 2008 , which meets the service standard for a Type 2 Part VII application."
I would like to know when the CRTC plans on its ruling. What is the new date?
I would also like to see this new date and ammendment specified on the above mentioned website since many people are involved and following this and see zero reference from the Commission on this date ammendment/change.
Should changes not be addressed by the Commission? Or should the people just find out from an obscure CBC article?
This isn't right.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
| oh yeah you can file a complaint also via:
»www.crtc.gc.ca/RapidsCCM/Register.asp?lang=E
I suggest you do it to get the point across to them that what they are pulling here isn't right. |
|
| said by oh yeah :
I suggest you do it to get the point across to them that what they are pulling here isn't right.
Yeah... as opposed to sodomizing us collectively with the "decision"... can't wait...  |
|
Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
 ·TELUS
1 edit | reply to oh yeah
My complaint:
As per file no 8622-C51-200805153
I find it higly disregardful and suspicious that the scheduled and alloted time was not respected and furthermore no notice of delay was posted.
The lack of rigorous follow-up on this matter doesn't do much to reassure the people (I for one) that the procedures are above board and done without improper prejudice.
That being said, where is the filing for the delay, where was or is it announced? And if it was not, who is accountable?
I await with high anticipation. Edit: Got, confirmation it was recieved. |
|
