 spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium
join:2001-08-07
Elk Grove, CA
kudos:1
 ·Clear Wireless
| To Quote: "Wilderotter said Frontier was looking at providing higher monthly limits, perhaps 20 gigabytes per month, in more urban markets like Rochester and Elk Grove, Calif., where usage is higher than rural areas."
Cannot speak for Rochester, but here in Elk Grove, Calif., the only reason Frontier is contemplating higher caps is due to the fact that Comcast and Surewest are kicking their sorry asses back to the stone ages. It's all good though, that sheit of a company is still just that: SHEIT!
--
The weekend is here, grab a can of beer! |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| Heh, so basically where they have competition they'll have higher (10, 20, 50 GB) limits, everywhere else people are stuck with 5GB. Pa-freaking-thetic. Anyone have the numbers for their plan costs? Might be a nice market for a budding WiSP to come into...could steal 100% of customers lol |
|
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
1 edit | reply to spewak
The fact they are even contemplating higher caps in some areas than others (for competitive reasons) means they know their proposed cap is ridiculously low. This is entirely about Frontier acting monopolistically to increase revenues and has absolutely nothing to do with network management. |
|
