Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » [Equipment] Netequalizer- setup performance issue
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
changing MaxRad MSP24013MB pattern »
« new Deliberant units  
AuthorAll Replies

AWireless

join:2008-10-31
Baton Rouge, LA

reply to CMack
Re: [Equipment] Netequalizer- setup performance issue

I have a T1 from the carrier.

UPDATE- I adjusted the Neteq box this morning and thought things were ok- well this afternoon, I had another customer call in complaining about intermittent pages not loading. I was at my wits end and just bypassed the box... Instantly it was fine. Web pages loaded like normal and I left it out for 20-30 minutes- not a glitch. I re-engaged the neteq box into the network again with the NetEq process "STOPPED". So I thought it would just be passive to my traffic. But same problems were happening. (web pages not loading consistantly- but connectivity through the box with ICMP/pings were fine). I left the neteq process stopped and in line and confirmed with two other customers and the same thing was happening. // I then took it back out of the network and all customers confirmed things were normal again.

DNS is resolving fine and very fast (resolving ping requests )

So it is narrowed down to the box. I am not sure if I have a hardware issue with the box or a configuration issue. Hoping it is a config issue... What concerns me is that it doesnt passively let the web traffic go through when it is off (Neteq process stopped). This may be an indicator that I have a bad box. I am not sure.- Can someone confirm that my thinking is correct?

// When I turn on the NetEq process, it does log the users when they exceed the limits and it seems to be working, but the underlying issue with the webpages not loading are still there and they have to refresh and retry multiple times to get through. - even on a user that has not been passing any traffic previously and is not being penalized in the log files.

I know the neteq box is a good product- as I have another friend that has one and it rocks, but I am at a loss.

Any ideas???

Thanks.

robbin
Premium,MVM
join:2000-09-21
Leander, TX
Could it be a bad cable? I would replace the cables going to the box. Is your unit still under warranty?
-
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providerschanging MaxRad MSP24013MB pattern »
« new Deliberant units  


Monday, 14-Dec 16:11:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [93] Google To Sell Phone Directly To Consumers
· [61] TiVO Tries To Figure Out Where It Fits
· [46] Faster Verizon DSL Service Will Burn Your House Down
· [41] NY Times: AT&T 3G Network Is Secretly Awesome
· [15] Rural Broadband User? You're Screwed
· [13] Sweden First To Get LTE Service
· [1] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Official Mediacom Email Discussion Thread [Mediacom]
· Ashen Verdict Rep farming guide (ICC 10) [World of Warcraft]
· personal check etiquette [General Questions]
· [Rant] BUG in MY FOOD, After i ate 90% of it.. [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· DKs and their obsession with Agility [World of Warcraft]
· Privacy concerns: dump Google and move to Bing [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· What VOIP changes did you make in 2009? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Most Hated 5-man now. [World of Warcraft]