st7860
join:2004-05-13
San Francisco, CA | reply to Blago
Re: . teksavvy just basically resells bell services and provides their own customer service and billing, and a few misc. servers like mail and so on. if they instead colocated equipment with bell, throttling wouldn't be a problem. they choose to re-sell bell services instead of putting their own equipment in. i'm right. |
|
|
|
| said by st7860:teksavvy just basically resells bell services and provides their own customer service and billing, and a few misc. servers like mail and so on. if they instead colocated equipment with bell, throttling wouldn't be a problem. they choose to re-sell bell services instead of putting their own equipment in. i'm right. Your lack of understanding is truly remarkable, your laziness to research the subject is predictable and your personality to always think your right is laughable.
Your wrong, listen to Rocky, you might learn a thing or two. |
|
| reply to st7860
Re: . St7860>
Would you care to comment on your infinite wisdom as to why these tariffs are in place in the first place?
I would assume it was to build the competitive landscape of DSL providers in Canada. (could you comment on this with respect to your above comments?)
You seem to have succesfully identified that there is a plan in place to INCREASE the competitive landscape in Canada. However, you ignore the point of this tariff and Also, with respect to the agreements that Bell Canada signed with these indy service providers.
Would you care to comment as to why a government would create such an agreement to increase competition and as to why a company as "reputable" and a "good faith" bargainer (as they would claim in their defense), would be forced to manipulate the market for their own benefit (i.e. to kill of the government mandated competition)? |
|
