<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Bad Business Model? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21369487</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:23:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:23:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bad Business Model?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21373001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1014383"><b>Gogo1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BIGMIKE <A HREF="/useremail/u/641535"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The latest graphics cards have been used to break Wi-Fi encryption far quicker than was previously possible. Some security consultants are already suggesting the development blows Wi-Fi security out of the water and that corporations ought to apply tighter VPN controls, or abandon wireless networks altogether, in response.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10/graphics_card_wireless_hacking/" >www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10&middot;&middot;&middot;hacking/</A><br> </div>So are appropriately chosen passwords still safe for WPA2 if it is brute force? It sounds like it. For now.<br>Whats a suitable password? Just something very long and using caps, numbers, special characters etc?<br>Although what those guys are suggesting is that its just a matter of time before any WPA2 password can be brute forced, is that correct?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21373001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:46:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bad Business Model?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369487</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641535"><b>BIGMIKE</b></A> : Cracking a wireless network in 3 minutes<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/05/1428250&from=rss" >hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl&middot;&middot;&middot;from=rss</A><br><br>Turbo-charged wireless hacks threaten networks<br><br>The latest graphics cards have been used to break Wi-Fi encryption far quicker than was previously possible. Some security consultants are already suggesting the development blows Wi-Fi security out of the water and that corporations ought to apply tighter VPN controls, or abandon wireless networks altogether, in response.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10/graphics_card_wireless_hacking/" >www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10&middot;&middot;&middot;hacking/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369487</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:21:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bad Business Model?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369383</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : this may further fracture alliances within the EU, as it should. I think if they pause and peer into their own financial messes, they may realize that they bigger fish to fry!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369383</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:01:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bad Business Model?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369240</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/500454"><b>Raptor</b></A> : I can't see the ISP's being entirely diligent on this one as it would cost them customers in the end.  I don't see this working.  The government let alone the ISP's aren't competent enough to reliably enforce such a measure even if they wanted to do so, privacy issues aside.<br><br>Now I'm curious as to the feedback, if any, that will come from the EU.  I'm not that familiar with how much influence the EU has though in regards to such an issue.<br><small>--<br>....where's my fiber?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21369240</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:34:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
