Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Launches Investigation Into High TV Prices » Analog channels
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Free Bentleys For All!  
AuthorAll Replies

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

reply to JKL in NBK
Re: Analog channels

IF they were charging the same amount for the digital channels as the analog channels then I would agree with you. Since the channels are already in digital (most channels are available that way now) shouldn't it be cheaper for them to rebroadcast them than to convert the signal back to analog? So why are they charging more for the same channels?

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by Lazlow See Profile :

...shouldn't it be cheaper for them to rebroadcast them than to convert the signal back to analog? ...
they are not allowed to down-convert digital signals to analog (some amendment passed by congress!), so they have to transmit analog channels. I believe it's so people on the basic tier don't have to get a box - so even after the transition, if you have an old analog TV, but subscribe to a basic cable tier, you can still get channels on your old tv without a box. The basic tier is the only cable programming still regulated by the govt.

this requirement goes away eventually, but I forget when.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

said by nasadude See Profile :

so they have to transmit analog channels.
Basic only, i.e. locals, for cable companies with any analog transmission capability.
said by nasadude See Profile :

this requirement goes away eventually, but I forget when.
2012.

»fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···70A2.txt


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to nasadude
said by nasadude See Profile :

said by Lazlow See Profile :

...shouldn't it be cheaper for them to rebroadcast them than to convert the signal back to analog? ...
they are not allowed to down-convert digital signals to analog (some amendment passed by congress!), so they have to transmit analog channels. I believe it's so people on the basic tier don't have to get a box - so even after the transition, if you have an old analog TV, but subscribe to a basic cable tier, you can still get channels on your old tv without a box. The basic tier is the only cable programming still regulated by the govt.

this requirement goes away eventually, but I forget when.
The cable franchising agreements for BASIC cable only REQUIRE a very small set of cable channels(usually local OTA channels, and a couple PEG channels). The channels being moved to digital tiers are most likely not included in those agreements. If that is true, and I think it is, the FCC doesn't have a leg to stand on when demanding price decreases for basic tiers.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

reply to nasadude
How is that going to work? After the cutoff date stations will only be transmitting in digital. If they are not allowed to convert from digital, where are they going to get the signal from? I knew that they had to continue life line(for a while) in analog but I assumed it would just be a signal they converted from digital. I also think that the FCC is letting them bypass this requirement IF they provide a free converter box until that required date. Which, depending on how many you would have to support, may be a cheaper way out for the cable co's.


dnoyeB
Ferrous Phallus

join:2000-10-09
Southfield, MI
I did not think cable companies got their local TV signals OTA. Is this true?

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
I think some do but most have a direct feed. But that feed is still in a digital form. Think about how individual stations get their "feed" from the head office, digital.
-
Forums » FCC Launches Investigation Into High TV Prices« Free Bentleys For All!  


Monday, 30-Nov 06:55:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]