Topic '80 for Elite?' in forum '' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/80-for-Elite-21384875 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:36:36 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:36:36 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21393550 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21393550 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:24:50 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390669
I don't want Uverse TV. I have Directv and have no need for their services. So I would take the higher speeds.

Let me break it down to small sentences for you.

Ptrowski = no current caps.
Rick = current caps
Caps = bad
More speed = good for everyone*

*ANY speed increases in the broadband world as a whole is good. It promotes competition which benefits everyone. Do I need to wrap that sentence in a brick and bang you over the head with it?
--
"So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390669 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:43:41 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390614
You would ALSO get it by having to then CAP people at "ridiculous" levels..so ridiculous that the 20Mb cap is not even ONE TENTH what Comcast "caps" at.

The limitations of this "next generation" Uverse service are falling apart by the minute as they desperately try to be anything at all in this new world of broadband being introduced by verizon with their FTTH service..and comcast with docsis 3.0.
Exactly..as I predicted it would. Up to 2 years ago..unless they heeded the suggestion that they MUST begin a FTTH rollout.

Now..they pay they price.

And nowhere is that more evident than in YOUR own statement..about how YOU will be bailing on them.

Said by Ptrowski:
"No way. If that is their idea I will switch back to the local cable company. 80 gb is RIDICULOUS."

You're right Ptrowski.
Absolutely right.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390614 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:30:10 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390574
The speeds for Uverse are going up as we saw. They are moving forward with higher tiers. How is that bad Rick? And don;t forget that in new developments AT&T IS deploying FTTP. Granted the speed tiers are the saem as Uverse, but they are doing fiber in select areas.

Right now it is a trial. HOPEFULLY is does not go across the boards as the cable companies have done. Right now I am not capped, I hope it stays that way. So 250 gigs is good, but my current uncapped system is better. No collars around my neck yet.

If you find my opposing the proposed caps for AT&T being in agreement with you, then so be it. I oppose caps across the boards.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390574 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:22:24 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390536
I'd call my predictions dead on accurate when it comes to how they should have rolled out FTTH instead. You..on the other hand..countered every post I made as being wrong.

Was I wrong about docsis 3.0 and how fast it would be coming out? It sure doesn't look that way..does it?
Was I wrong about how slow and outdated uverse would look in comparison..especially with this being AT&T's "next" generation service? It sure doesn't look that way.

And, was I wrong about Comcasts 250 gig "caps" as being extremely generous given what the competition would offer?
It sure doesn't look that way.

Instead..what we now have is you..in your own words..saying
how ridiculous AT&T is for proposing this. And how you'll be bailing on them and switching to your cable company instead.

Mr Ptrowski..it looks like you've agreed with me the whole time.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390536 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:13:10 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390375 said by Rick:

said by ptrowski:

No way. If that is their idea I will switch back to the local cable company. 80 gb is RIDICULOUS.
Seeing you've been one of their biggest critics....how are you feeling about comcasts 250 gig cap in comparison now?
Rick! I was wondering when I would see you.

First things first, I am more a critic of your blatant shilling. No one takes such an interest in an ISP unless they are affiliated with them.

That being said, obviously 250 gb is better than 80 gb, no questions asked. Luckily they are trials in one market now, and I am not capped at this time. Should it be rolled out market wide like Comcast has done then I will look elsewhere.
--
"So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390375 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:27:12 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390073 said by ptrowski:

No way. If that is their idea I will switch back to the local cable company. 80 gb is RIDICULOUS.
Seeing you've been one of their biggest critics....how are you feeling about comcasts 250 gig cap in comparison now?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21390073 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:32:17 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21387585 said by en102:

This is where I _really_ find that the cap ratio isn't consistent.
Interesting observation. But - what actually costs? The speed or transfer? I use less than 10GB/mo, but wouldn't want to have under 1Mbs service. Tying the two together doesn't make that much sense to me.
Joe]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21387585 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:56:30 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21387487 said by pspcrazy:

Please don't fall into their game of actually fighting over which cap is better. Try to find something uncapped instead.
Unfortunately, a lot of people won't have that option. Besides, the uncapped solution may not be the best. Just because its uncapped doesn't mean its what you should buy. Case in point, I could go with a 3rd party DSL provider that is uncapped in this area, but if I do, I will be limited to 768k. Is that worth it? Not to me.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21387487 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:39:42 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386926 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386926 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:15:59 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386793 said by ptrowski:

No way. If that is their idea I will switch back to the local cable company. 80 gb is RIDICULOUS.
I am in the same boat and I agree with you. I would call Comcast in a heartbeat and sign up for cable modem service before I would go with AT&T in that situation. Their 250gb cap is much more friendly. While more expensive, I know comcast works great in our area and I know I would get more bang for the buck so to speak.

The ball is in AT&Ts court here.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386793 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:53:13 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386773 --

- "Techie" Jim]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386773 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:50:01 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386593
I just had a DSL line installed for my work at another office. I ordered pro, but the max sync is only 2160kbps (was 1650kbps till I complained for 2 weeks and got them to change the circuit). I'm paying $40/m for that but I got a deal, the normal price Pro with a single dynamic IP is now $52/m.
I'm likely to push around 100-400GB of data over than line a month. If this caps get applied to their business lines, they're going to loose a lot of business.

And uVerse too?!? Well forget that shit then, I was considering switching from TWC to uVerse Max, but if they're going to cap it, they can just go ahead and remove their VRAD from my neighborhood, I won't care.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386593 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:17:28 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386065
768kbps - 20GB (1Mbps:26GB)
1.5Mbps - 40GB (1Mbps:26GB)
3.0Mbps - 60GB (1Mbps:20GB) - getting worse
6.0Mbps - 80GB (1Mbps:13GB) - worse yet
10.0Mbps - 150 (1Mbps:15GB) - not much better

I would expect the cap ratio to actually get 'better' as the price and speed increases... not worse.

If they kept the ratio consistent across the board, here's what it would look like:

768kbps - 20GB (1Mbps:26GB)
1.5Mbps - 40GB (1Mbps:26GB)
3.0Mbps - 80GB (1Mbps:26GB)
6.0Mbps - 160GB (1Mbps:26GB)
10.0Mbps - 260GB (1Mbps:26GB) ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21386065 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:37:50 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385600 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385600 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:13:22 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385343 To get the discounted rate on the cable tier, I need to have basic cable service which won't work as I have Directv.

So $39.95 for 6/512 (my bad on the other price) plus $51.05 for basic cable. Never mind what it would cost to terminate the DTV service. Just doesn't make sense. But should the caps hit my area, away I go.
--
"So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385343 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:27:51 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385253 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385253 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:10:57 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385217
Two reasons actually. One is price vs speed. For 6/512 they charge $45 I belive, for 5.1/656 on ATT it is $35. I also use VoIP and I have found that the quality on DSL is superior to cable....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385217 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:03:32 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385203 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21385203 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:00:56 EDT Re: 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21384920 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-80-for-Elite-21384920 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:07:03 EDT 80 for Elite? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/80-for-Elite-21384875 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/80-for-Elite-21384875 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:55:10 EDT