Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Network DVR Court Fight Continues » Networks being inconsistent
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
all about control »
« sigh  
AuthorAll Replies
-

Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

reply to Neyland
Re: Networks being inconsistent

said by Neyland See Profile :

It seems to me that this could be easily argued that because I as the end user are in control of both the record request and the playback, and I'm viewing for my private enjoyment in my home that the cable company is in fact not rebroadcasting, but rather simply acting as a storage median.
It could be argued that if I receive a broadcast station from the cable headend for my private enjoyment that the cable company is simply acting as my antenna. Whether I like it or not (and if retransmission consent agreements increase my bill I don't) the content providers ultimately won their argument against that in court.


Neyland

join:2003-02-04
USA

reply to Sammer
Is this a matter of 10 people record 'LOST' so the network DVR records it once and grants all 10 people that had prior requests to recording access so this is considered a
rebroadcast?

It seems to me that this could be easily argued that because I as the end user are in control of both the record request and the playback, and I'm viewing for my private enjoyment in my home that the cable company is in fact not rebroadcasting, but rather simply acting as a storage median.

Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

reply to Neyland
said by Neyland See Profile :

I agree I just don't see what the difference is between having a box that records at my TV vs moving the 'box' to a virutal 'box' that exists at the head end.
The difference is the content providers want the for profit cable companies to have to obtain their permission.


Neyland

join:2003-02-04
USA

reply to RARPSL
I agree I just don't see what the difference is between having a box that records at my TV vs moving the 'box' to a virutal 'box' that exists at the head end. Heck if anything it acutally reduces the ability to grab the copyrighted material by the end user.
Forums » Network DVR Court Fight Continuesall about control »
« sigh  


Saturday, 28-Nov 09:47:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [72] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [69] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [52] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· Bell offering 175M service :) [TekSavvy]
· [Extreme Plus] Issues hosting on Xbox Live [Rogers]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Hosts file attributes set to system and hidden [Security]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· Motion Sickness Solutions? [General Questions]