Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to Kearnstd
Re: the consumer is more important then law.
i prefer my local disk based DVR, my simple point is that if the people want it then the entertainment industry shouldnt have a legal right to deny it.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
magnushsi
join:2002-11-06
Cedar Springs, MI
1 edit | reply to kinabrew
If you are able to get content off a Moto or Cisco DVR, you should post how you did it.
Nothing saying you can't skip commercials on a network DVR. |
|
kinabrew
join:2002-02-01
 ·Comcast
| reply to Kearnstd
Do you want network DVR?
I definitely don't, because if companies offer network DVR service, I would expect them to be less likely to offer box DVR service, and having the box DVR gives me more chance to extract and permanently save video, as well as more control over how the video is played(like skipping commercials).
--
from MacStack.net |
|
mrchris
We don't miss you Bush
Premium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY | reply to Kearnstd
IP laws direly need an overhaul without douchebags like RIAA getting in the way of buying their way for laws they want. |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
| if the customer wants network DVR then they should get Network DVR and copyright law shouldnt be allowed to prevent it nore should the content owners. the IP owners need to learn that they are our slaves, without us consumers they wouldnt exist.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
