 NightfallMy Goal Is To Deny YoursPremium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric
| reply to ptrowski
Re: 80 for Elite? said by ptrowski:No way. If that is their idea I will switch back to the local cable company. 80 gb is RIDICULOUS. I am in the same boat and I agree with you. I would call Comcast in a heartbeat and sign up for cable modem service before I would go with AT&T in that situation. Their 250gb cap is much more friendly. While more expensive, I know comcast works great in our area and I know I would get more bang for the buck so to speak.
The ball is in AT&Ts court here. |
|
 pspcrazyAnime Freak join:2008-02-06 San Diego, CA | Please don't fall into their game of actually fighting over which cap is better. Try to find something uncapped instead. |
|
|
|
 NightfallMy Goal Is To Deny YoursPremium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric
| said by pspcrazy:Please don't fall into their game of actually fighting over which cap is better. Try to find something uncapped instead. Unfortunately, a lot of people won't have that option. Besides, the uncapped solution may not be the best. Just because its uncapped doesn't mean its what you should buy. Case in point, I could go with a 3rd party DSL provider that is uncapped in this area, but if I do, I will be limited to 768k. Is that worth it? Not to me. |
|