| | moving I thought about moving into a att area. But since the caps came about I will be staying here and deal with cox slowness and all. at least cox doesn't have those kind of caps. | |
|
 | | Re: moving So you know you are moving more than 150GB/month? Or are you just opposed to caps on principle? | |
|
 | | | Re: moving I am opposed to caps on principle. this metered internet usage is bull shit just plain bull shit. | |
|
| |  Ikyuao
join:2007-02-26
Wichita, KS
 ·Cox HSI
| Re: moving Why don't you start new ISP business with no cap? Show us that you don't carry any kind of caps? When your ISP business is growing into more larger complex networks then you might want to have cap implement to keep your network hardware running smooth performance because of complex systems.
--
64K TCP WIN is officially dead for long high latency fat network connection across internet. | |
|
| |
| | | | Re: moving Shouldn't that be 347MB/hr? More like 5.78MB/minute. | |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 | No, Cox has much lower limits. OTOH Cox doesn't enforce those limits... | |
|
| | | Re: moving thats why I am staying with cox | |
|
|
|
·
·