<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: WPA Crack in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21387826</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:23:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:23:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21395034</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : then i have mines.. and they're GREAT!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21395034</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21391410</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : err...thats WEP hacking in 2005. this is WPA cracking, slighty more complex, but still easy to do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21391410</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:16:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21390151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/990660"><b>scrummie02</b></A> : soekris also has a card.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.soekris.com/vpn1401.htm" >www.soekris.com/vpn1401.htm</A><br>It's been out for quite a while.  ..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21390151</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:42:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21389817</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/628714"><b>maartena</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What is no wireless then (only a hardwired lan)? :-P<br> </div>Ford Knox, surrounded by a mile-wide moat, filled with mines and other unpleasantries.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21389817</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:30:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21389230</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  cooperaaaron <A HREF="/useremail/u/987447"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>some card that could be installed in a slot ) when it is idle or lightly used, to encrypt data ?<br> </div>The problem is not encryption it is key management. AES is very secure. <br><br>Key management is is the weak point of most privacy schemes. The Enigma machines used by Germany during WWII were quite good. It was the way Germans created the daily key that allowed Alan Turing to crack the codes. If Germans used better keys and prefixed messages with random data (like the Allies did) most likely even the brilliant Turning would have been stymied. <br><br>/tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21389230</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:09:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388803</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fireflier <A HREF="/useremail/u/397739"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>What is no wireless then (only a hardwired lan)? :-P<br> </div>Pissed off midget with a flamethrower.<br> </div>LOL!  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388803</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:35:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388759</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/442241"><b>keyboard5684</b></A> : This is the same concept as a Cisco card that is used, an AIM module, which offloads the encryption onto that processor to take away from the main CPU.<br><br>Long ago, this is old technology, and can certainly be applied to wireless networks.<br><br>If you are that paranoid then simply create a VPN, dial into the VPN over the encrypted wireless access point, and then they would have to break the wireless and the extremely complex encryption with 3DES and other complex technologies long developed.<br><br>Geez...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388759</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:27:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388707</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/397739"><b>fireflier</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What is no wireless then (only a hardwired lan)? :-P<br> </div>Pissed off midget with a flamethrower.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388707</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:14:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388685</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What is no wireless then (only a hardwired lan)? :-P<br> </div>Smart ?<br><small>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388685</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:12:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388631</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Kearnstd <A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>id still compair WPA-TKIP to a deadbolt on your door and no windows in reach of ground level.<br> </div>Well, I'm not sure if I'd compare it to a deadbolt. I can pick the lock on a standard deadbolt in just a couple minutes using makeshift tools. I'm no locksmith either.<br><br>And this WPA cracking isn't quite available to the masses either, unlike WEP cracking.<br><br>Unless of course the key is a weak one, in which case it can be brute forced within a reasonable time frame. Good luck brute forcing a WPA key of 63 random characters (I think that's what the max is).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388631</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:01:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/786649"><b>BloodRoses</b></A> : Apple is doing something very similar to what you describe, or at least they're making it possible.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL</A><br><small>--<br>Faerie Blessings,<br>Stephanie - <A HREF="http://www.glitterfaerie.com">www.GlitterFaerie.com</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388334</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:14:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388092</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/987447"><b>cooperaaaron</b></A> : Let's say I had a computer with two graphics cards, why can't someone come up with a way to use one of the graphics cards ( or some card that could be installed in a slot ) when it is idle or lightly used, to encrypt data ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388092</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388030</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : Your first example is about cracking WEP which is old news.  This article is talking about cracking WPA, so they are not related.<br><br>You second example is not really cracking the WPA key, it's just a faster brute force attack. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21388030</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:13:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641535"><b>BIGMIKE</b></A> : Hacking Wireless Network is old news<br><br>Apr 05, 2005 <br>Feds Hack Wireless Network in 3 Minutes <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/05/1428250&from=rss" >hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl&middot;&middot;&middot;from=rss</A><br><br>Turbo-charged wireless hacks threaten networks<br><br>Graphics cards encryption skulduggery<br><br>By John Leyden &#149; Get more from this author<br><br>Posted in Enterprise Security, 10th October 2008 12:25 GMT<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10/graphics_card_wireless_hacking/" >www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/10&middot;&middot;&middot;hacking/</A><br><br>The latest graphics cards have been used to break Wi-Fi encryption far quicker than was previously possible. Some security consultants are already suggesting the development blows Wi-Fi security out of the water and that corporations ought to apply tighter VPN controls, or abandon wireless networks altogether, in response]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387923</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:55:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><b>swhitney2003</b></A> : What is no wireless then (only a hardwired lan)? :-P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387878</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:47:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387855</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><b>Kearnstd</b></A> : so they cracked it but it is still more secure then WEP.  id still compair WPA-TKIP to a deadbolt on your door and no windows in reach of ground level.  someone can get in but they have to work at it.<br><br>WPA2-AES is more like a motion sensing machinegun on the roof.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387855</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  danza <A HREF="/useremail/u/677561"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Seems like it. <br><br>They didn't mention AES at all in the article though.<br> </div>Read comments to the news item from PCWorld:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.pcworld.com/article/153396/" >www.pcworld.com/article/153396/</A><br><br>A thread in the Security forum discusses this:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21385720-New-method-found-to-crack-WPA-but-not-WPA2">New method found to crack WPA - but not WPA2</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387837</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:39:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677561"><b>danza</b></A> : Seems like it. <br><br>They didn't mention AES at all in the article though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387826</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:37:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387824</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Sacurtis <A HREF="/useremail/u/959660"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So this basically means that someone can't sniff my data but they can get on my network....Correct?<br> </div>Not exactly. They can see the data that is going TO the PC from the wireless router. They just can't see the data flowing FROM the PC back thru the router to the web host.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387824</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:37:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WPA Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387809</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/959660"><b>Sacurtis</b></A> : So this basically means that someone can't sniff my data but they can get on my network....Correct?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21387809</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:34:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
