republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Charter DOCSIS 3.0 Within Months » Cox...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« What they should do  
AuthorAll Replies

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
reply to houkouonchi
Re: Cox...

What makes you think earlier versions of Docsis are uncapable?


houkouonchi

join:2002-07-22
Corona, CA
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DSL EXTREME
·OCN
·Pacific Bell - SBC
·Charter Pipeline

said by Lazlow See Profile :

What makes you think earlier versions of Docsis are uncapable?
Because they are.

What makes you think they aren't?

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO


1 edit
Last time I checked the capping(at least the current type) was being done based on the cable modem's Mac address on the server (node) side. So it does not matter what version of Docsis the modem is using, they tally and control the cap from the far side of the modem.


houkouonchi

join:2002-07-22
Corona, CA
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DSL EXTREME
·OCN
·Pacific Bell - SBC
·Charter Pipeline

said by Lazlow See Profile :

Last time I checked the capping(at least the current type) was being done based on the cable modem's Mac address on the server (node) side. So it does not matter what version of Docsis the modem is using, they tally and control the cap from the far side of the modem.
Imagine there was a modem, and you could flash it to a custom firmware. This custom firmware allowed you to disable SNMP (so the ISP couldn't even query your modem), download a config file (which has capping information) over ethernet from your own TFTP server (host a 0/0 config) and allow you to change the HFC mac address to whatever you want.

Say you clone some other poor guys mac address 500 miles away from you. Although not impossible to catch its extremely difficult which is why many people do it and it is possible and people rarely get caught.

(Please don't think this is an admission from me that I uncap).
--
Chugging along on 2x 6016/768k DSL Extreme DSL lines and one 6016/768 ATT DSL DIrect line as well as one 10mb/1mb Charter cable line for a combined total of just over 26 meg download and 3 meg up (after overhead). yay!

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

houkouonchi

What you are describing is the cap on the speed of the modem. This is not the type of cap we are talking about. The current cap is on capacity (gigs downloaded per month). This capacity cap is tracked on the ISPs end and not the modem. Yes, you could circumvent this cap by changing the Mac of the modem to another valid Mac in the system(thus running up his tally instead of yours), but this would not be dependent on the Docsis version the system was running on(it is irrelevant). After the cap is reached the throttling is done on the ISPs side and generally not by changing the speed setting on the modem. Other than a Mac address the modem is essentially not involved. The ISPs are well aware of Mac spoofing.


houkouonchi

join:2002-07-22
Corona, CA
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DSL EXTREME
·OCN
·Pacific Bell - SBC
·Charter Pipeline

said by Lazlow See Profile :

houkouonchi

What you are describing is the cap on the speed of the modem. This is not the type of cap we are talking about. The current cap is on capacity (gigs downloaded per month). This capacity cap is tracked on the ISPs end and not the modem. Yes, you could circumvent this cap by changing the Mac of the modem to another valid Mac in the system(thus running up his tally instead of yours), but this would not be dependent on the Docsis version the system was running on(it is irrelevant). After the cap is reached the throttling is done on the ISPs side and generally not by changing the speed setting on the modem. Other than a Mac address the modem is essentially not involved. The ISPs are well aware of Mac spoofing.
I was always taking about speed uncapping not a bandwidth cap. Charter does not limit the bandwidth, they don't have a 'bandwidth cap'. I was originally responding the the comment about they will probably only have it in FIOS areas.

You are correct that bandwidth caps could be circumvented by hijacking other peoples mac addresses. I am not sure what you mean by throttle after a cap is hit. Who has caps that throttle you when they are hit? Also changing to a different mac address would likely circumvent this as well assuming they are not throttling everyone on your node.
-
Forums » Charter DOCSIS 3.0 Within Months« What they should do  


Saturday, 28-Nov 13:48:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [75] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [60] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Back to Comcast - Life Sucks Again - Montgomery County, MD [Comcast Cable TV]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· sysguard2010.com [Security]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Nvidia Forceware for Windows XP\2000\03 195.62 [Software]