republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

reply to marigolds

Re: Franchise Reform honors the Constitution

said by marigolds:

While abusing the public trust in the process and profiting off public lands.
Isn't America great?
If AT&T and cable companies want to pick and choose where to offer services, they can do it on private land and purchased private easements.
Lets switch to communism where the community owns all property in the USA and then we wont have silly little fights, comrade.


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

said by patcat88:

said by marigolds:

While abusing the public trust in the process and profiting off public lands.
Isn't America great?
If AT&T and cable companies want to pick and choose where to offer services, they can do it on private land and purchased private easements.
Lets switch to communism where the community owns all property in the USA and then we wont have silly little fights, comrade.
Oh, I get it, you think that public trust lands are communism.

Because I know you don't read the newspapers:

Martin v. Waddell:
»supreme.justia.com/us/41/367/
Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois:
»supreme.justia.com/us/163/142/

And a good summary too in case that is too much:
»www.slc.ca.gov/Policy_Statements···rine.pdf

I think you will find Illinois Central particularly relevant and enlightening on this particular public trust issue.
Meanwhile, Martin v Waddell should firmly establish for you why the public trust is a Constitutionally granted foundation of the American Republic and a capitalist society.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://bbs.iscabbs.com
Professional Geographer
Geographic Information Science researcher


mod_wastrel
Gone fishin'

join:2008-03-28

reply to patcat88
Uhhh, the "community" does own public land, and easements are private property. In what sense should at&t or any telco/cableco have the right to do anything they want to with land they don't own? Would you simply give over to them the right to do anything with your land that they want to? someone else's land?

All your land are belong to us!


patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

reply to marigolds

said by marigolds:

I think you will find Illinois Central particularly relevant and enlightening on this particular public trust issue.
Meanwhile, Martin v Waddell should firmly establish for you why the public trust is a Constitutionally granted foundation of the American Republic and a capitalist society.
Screw that, 1 mille per breath of air or I'm bagging your head to prevent theft of property.


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

I don't even know what that means but it's funny!


Thursday, 31-May 21:44:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics