 SLD Premium join:2002-04-17 | Obama Funny how so many people bought the story that Obama was driven mostly by individual contributions. I'm glad he beat McCain, but it'll come out that he is a corporate toadie just like the rest of them. | |
|
 I pos rep
join:2008-08-22
| Re: Obama said by SLD :Funny how so many people bought the story that Obama was driven mostly by individual contributions. I'm glad he beat McCain, but it'll come out that he is a corporate toadie just like the rest of them. Stating the obvious much? You realize how much money alone they used on advertising right?
I am sure Obama could not pay that out of his own checking account. Obviously every politician has some corporate ties in some way. One might have less than the other and be better but both candidates always share a lot in common. When have you seen an independent win recently? This has happened very few times in the whole country's history and I can't remember when that was last. | |
|
 |   jmn1207 Premium join:2000-07-19 Reston, VA
·Verizon FIOS
1 edit | Re: Obama said by I pos rep :When have you seen an independent win recently? This has happened very few times in the whole country's history and I can't remember when that was last. What do you expect when a duopoly of political parties bands together and creates the rules for elections and national debates? I wouldn't expect them to allow for an impartial 3rd party to be able to get involved and make any kind of a legitimate impact on the status quo. Besides, money is the biggest obstacle, and anyone with the resources to generate enough of it are probably not much different in character and substance than any other career politician looking out for the corporations.
Sorry Comcast, we will surely see another "Martin" in this position as the Telcos have control and they know how to keep it. | |
|
 |  |   S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL | Re: Obama So your saying that you don't think Ross Perot would have had an impact before he went crazy?  | |
|
 |  |  |  |
  Titus Pullo I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26
·Embarq
| said by SLD :Funny how so many people bought the story that Obama was driven mostly by individual contributions. I'm glad he beat McCain, but it'll come out that he is a corporate toadie just like the rest of them. If you want a pol not tied to corporate money, you'd better find another party. Strike that, another country. Strike that ... you won't find one. -- | |
|
 |   SLD Premium join:2002-04-17 | Re: Obama I voted for Nader. | |
|
 |  |  satellite68
join:2007-04-11 Louisville, KY
| Re: Obama said by SLD :I voted for Nader. In other news, local man shouts obscenities at passing train. Nobody heard what he was saying, so the story seems unimportant.
Glad to know you're one of the 600k people who voted for an asshat like Nader, who just can't keep his yapper shut:
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibsP6XN2dIo | |
|
 |  |  |   SLD Premium join:2002-04-17 1 edit | Re: Obama Understand his words in the context of his argument and you'll understand that Fox missed the point. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| Re: Obama said by SLD :Understand his words in the context of his argument and you'll understand that Fox missed the poing. There is ZERO context in which it is ok to call a black man especially the President "Uncle Tom". NONE. ZILCH. NADA. he might as well called him a n1gger. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   SLD Premium join:2002-04-17
·Comcast
3 edits | Re: Obama If you *listen*, he never called him that. You could Wikipedia the term to understand it a bit. I know you're from good 'ole Tennessee, but remember, just because FOX says it doesn't make it true.
Nader speaks in terms of consumerism vs. corporate power. He is a minority Arab-American. He as protected all of us with his work and saved thousands of lives in the process. Just because Shepard Smith and some blondie GOP "newscaster" misunderstand his statements doesn't make them incorrect. | |
|
 |  |   Truthful
@dslblast.com | If you voted for Nader, you effectively voted for Bush. Pleased with yourself? | |
|
 |  |  |   SLD Premium join:2002-04-17 | Re: Obama You may have noticed that Bush wasn't running... And if you sell your vote to the least worse candidate, you just sold yourself short. | |
|
 |  |  |   james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| said by Truthful :
If you voted for Nader, you effectively voted for Bush. Pleased with yourself? The only reason third party votes are throwaway votes is because everyone thinks they're throwaway votes. It's self fulfilling, and only true because it is throught to be true.
The Democrats and Republicans are the same party, they went to the same schools and were in the same fraternities. They only differ on a very few unimportant things such as Gay Marriage and Abortion, but are arm in arm when it comes to all the important things such as pandering to corporate fat cats and keeping wars going. | |
|
  supergirl
join:2007-03-20 Pensacola, FL | Before Martin took over, the FCC was more consumer friendly. Democrats will make it that way again. | |
|
 |  Bill03 Premium join:2007-11-26 Richmond, VA clubs:
| Re: Obama said by supergirl :Before Martin took over, the FCC was more consumer friendly. Democrats will make it that way again. I wished I shared your optimism. | |
|
 |  voipdabbler
join:2006-04-27 Kalispell, MT
| I wouldn't hold my breath. Biden, Obama and other Congressional democrats have just as many connections with industry groups that want to limit fair use and other consumer rights (doctrine of first sale, etc.). Truthfully, this country needs a viable third political party--the democrats and republicans are too closely aligned on many policy issues (gee, guess who marched lock-step with Bush on anything labeled "national security"--democrats currently in Congress). With respect to cable, cellular, etc., you're more likely to see higher fees, period. (I expect to see federal regulatory fees for almost everything increase; if you don't cut federal spending then you have to increase fees and taxes.) Thankfully, Congress only sits for 2 years--in 2010 all of the house and 1/3rd of the Senate will be up for re-election. If the 111th Congress, which will be sworn in in January 2009, enacts unpopular/harmful legislation, then the majority party will pay the price at the polls in the 2010 elections. | |
|
 |   battleop
join:2005-09-28 00000 | Heh This will probably delay the thoughs of an AT&T Verizon merger by 4 to 8 years | |
|
 |  |  Sammer
join:2005-12-22 Canonsburg, PA
| Re: Obama said by battleop :Heh This will probably delay the thoughs of an AT&T Verizon merger by 4 to 8 years Do you really think AT&T will screw up so badly that Verizon will be able to afford to take them over? | |
|
 |  |  |   battleop
join:2005-09-28 00000 | Re: Obama If anything maybe one would trade it's wireless for the others land line. It's not very likely to happen but if it were to happen it would happen under a heavily republican administration. | |
|
 |  Sammer
join:2005-12-22 Canonsburg, PA
| said by supergirl :Before Martin took over, the FCC was more consumer friendly. Democrats will make it that way again. The two current Democrats prove that isn't necessarily true. | |
|
 |
 |   Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02
Host: Road Runner PC gaming GAMES PC gaming Tech
| Re: Obama quote: At least 1 thing is certain - Comcast's Cohen will have the ear of the President as 1 of his biggest fund raisers in the recent election.
Technically, that's the only thing that isn't certain in this story. Interesting point otherwise, though. | |
|
 |  elray
join:2000-12-16 Santa Monica, CA
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by TKJunkMail :Will this give Comcast a break at the FCC after Martin and his cable vendetta is gone from the scene? At least 1 thing is certain - Comcast's Cohen will have the ear of the President as 1 of his biggest fund raisers in the recent election. I guess a lot of people will be shocked that Obama was/is/will be bought just like all pols. Uh, vendetta?
The FCC hasn't done anything substantial to rein in cable, since the "reform" act passed Congress. They've given a slight gift to telcos - removing line sharing and state regulation of DSL, but that really only puts them on a level playing field with cable.
Not the way I'd run things, but hardly a "vendetta". | |
|
 |
|
 |