<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: OpeNDNS&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406472</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:13:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:13:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21411913</link>
<description><![CDATA[Raphion posted : I have 4.2.2.4-5 as my DNS, but when I go to &raquo;<A HREF="http://entropy.dns-oarc.net/test/" >entropy.dns-oarc.net/test/</A> it tells me my server names are:<br>1. 209.244.5.159 (ics2.Atlanta1.Level3.net)<br>2. 209.244.7.132 (unknown.Level3.net)<br>No gtei there. As I understand it, those 4.2.2.x addresses aren't actually server addresses, but rather, requests to those addresses are routed to the nearest available Level3.net DNS servers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21411913</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:19:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21409727</link>
<description><![CDATA[kontos posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1301123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301123');">kieranmullen</a>:</small><br><pre class="brush: text">nslookup 4.2.2.1&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.1&#012; &#012;nslookup 4.2.2.2&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.2&#012; &#012;nslookup 4.2.2.3&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-lc.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.3&#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block--></div>I suspect that that is a result of sloppy reverse DNS management on Level3's part.<br>Verizon (gtei.net) doesn't seep to agree that those hostnames are theirs:<br><pre class="brush: text">kontos:~$ host vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net&#012;vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net does not exist, try again&#012;kontos:~$ host vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net&#012;vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net does not exist, try again&#012;kontos:~$ host vnsc-lc.sys.gtei.net&#012;vnsc-lc.sys.gtei.net does not exist, try again&#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block--><br>and the servers appear to indicate that they are managed by Level3:<br><br><pre class="brush: text">kontos:~$ dig @4.2.2.1 ch txt version.bind&#012; &#012;; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.3.4-P1.1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; @4.2.2.1 ch txt version.bind&#012;; (1 server found)&#012;;; global options:  printcmd&#012;;; Got answer:&#012;;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 38023&#012;;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#012; &#012;;; QUESTION SECTION:&#012;;version.bind.                  CH      TXT&#012; &#012;;; ANSWER SECTION:&#012;version.bind.           0       CH      TXT     "If you have a legitimate reason for requesting this info, please contact hostmaster@Level3.net"&#012; &#012;;; Query time: 6 msec&#012;;; SERVER: 4.2.2.1#53(4.2.2.1)&#012;;; WHEN: Tue Nov 11 15:13:02 2008&#012;;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#012; &#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21409727</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:18:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408342</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetFixer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1553280" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1553280');">NetAdmin1</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/856374" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=856374');">jester121</a>:</small><br><br>That will be a very interesting day in the IT field, when we learn who's sloppy and who's not.<br> </div>Or who can remember their ISPs DNS servers.    4.2.2.2 was such a great server because it was so easy to use during an initial setup when you didn't have easy access to your ISPs DNS addresses or just plain forgot the DNS server address.<br> </div>I think the "interesting day" and "sloppy" references are about the unknown thousands of PCs currently using the 4.2.2.x DNS servers because some tech did a quick fix 5 years ago and now nobody even remembers that it had been done. <br><br>The downtime and ISP and IT department headaches that will result on the day those DNS servers become restricted to authorized users could rival the problems caused by Blaster and Welchia.<br><small>--<br>History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.<br>-- Dwight D. Eisenhower<br><A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net">Test your firewall.</a><br><A HREF="http://nature-pics.com">Smell the flowers.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408342</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:46:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408297</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetAdmin1 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/856374" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=856374');">jester121</a>:</small><br><br>That will be a very interesting day in the IT field, when we learn who's sloppy and who's not.<br> </div>Or who can remember their ISPs DNS servers.    4.2.2.2 was such a great server because it was so easy to use during an initial setup when you didn't have easy access to your ISPs DNS addresses or just plain forgot the DNS server address.<br><small>--<br>---<br>Drilling for more oil is akin to giving a methhead the keys to the meth lab.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408297</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:34:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408202</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetFixer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1301123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301123');">kieranmullen</a>:</small><br><br>I believe the above lends some information on the intermixing...<br> </div>                                                            <br>I believe the term for this type of perpetual post buyout/merger usage is <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_clause">grandfathering</a>.<br><small>--<br>History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.<br>-- Dwight D. Eisenhower<br><A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net">Test your firewall.</a><br><A HREF="http://nature-pics.com">Smell the flowers.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408202</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:09:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408162</link>
<description><![CDATA[kieranmullen posted : I believe the above lends some information on the intermixing...  <br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1030204" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1030204');">NetFixer</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1301123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301123');">kieranmullen</a>:</small><br><br>Why would level3 have a hold on IP blocks from verizon? You would think that verizon would have many of its own blocks registered.<br> </div>Why would Microsoft need to use Akamai Technologies servers and IP adresses? The simple answer is that corporations sub contract and sub lease services and properties from other corporations all the time.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408162</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:59:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408147</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetFixer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1301123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301123');">kieranmullen</a>:</small><br><br>Why would level3 have a hold on IP blocks from verizon? You would think that verizon would have many of its own blocks registered.<br> </div>Why would Microsoft need to use Akamai Technologies servers and IP adresses? The simple answer is that corporations sub contract and sub lease services and properties from other corporations all the time.<br><small>--<br>History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.<br>-- Dwight D. Eisenhower<br><A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net">Test your firewall.</a><br><A HREF="http://nature-pics.com">Smell the flowers.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408147</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:57:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408128</link>
<description><![CDATA[kieranmullen posted : ask... well I suppose I could have looked it up as well.<br><br>Why would level3 have a hold on IP blocks from verizon? You would think that verizon would have many of its own blocks registered.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.isp-planet.com/news/2002/lvlt_genu_021129.html" >www.isp-planet.com/news/2002/lvl&middot;&middot;&middot;129.html</A><br><br>Level3 bought genuity.com which was the networking GTE I believe. Verizon bought GTE.  <br><br>Nevermind its a mess that does not benefit me knowing in anyway.  I will just assume for the foreseeable future that the Level 3 servers will work with Verizon FIOS]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408128</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:52:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408033</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetFixer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1301123" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301123');">kieranmullen</a>:</small><br><br>They are the servers that are used for Verizon Fios Setup too! I wonder if they have some sort of agreement with them.<br> </div>Ask and ye shall receive   <IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/v2/lite/smile.gif"> <br><br><pre class="brush: text">nslookup 4.2.2.1&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.1&#012; &#012;nslookup 4.2.2.2&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.2&#012; &#012;nslookup 4.2.2.3&#012;Server:  dcs-gw1.dcs-net&#012;Address:  192.168.10.1&#012; &#012;Name:    vnsc-lc.sys.gtei.net&#012;Address:  4.2.2.3&#012; &#012;-----------------------------------------------------------------------&#012; &#012;whois gtei.net&#012; &#012;Registrant:&#012;        Verizon Trademark Services LLC&#012;        Verizon Trademark Services LLC&#012;        1320 North Court House Road&#012;         Arlington VA 22201&#012;        US&#012;        domainlegalcontact@verizon.com +1.7033513164 Fax: +1.7033513669&#012;    Domain Name: gtei.net&#012;        Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com&#012;        Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com&#012;        Registrar Homepage: http://www.markmonitor.com&#012;    Administrative Contact:&#012;        Domain Administrator&#012;        Verizon Trademark Services LLC&#012;        1320 North Court House Road&#012;         Arlington VA 22201&#012;        US&#012;        domainlegalcontact@verizon.com +1.7033513164 Fax: +1.7033513669&#012;    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:&#012;        Domain Technician&#012;        Verizon&#012;        1320 North Court House Road&#012;         Arlington VA 22201&#012;        US&#012;        sysmgr@verizon.com +1.7033513164 Fax: +1.7033513669&#012;    Created on..............: 1997-12-10.&#012;    Expires on..............: 2010-12-08.&#012;    Record last updated on..: 2008-11-06.&#012;    Domain servers in listed order:&#012;    dnsauth3.sys.gtei.net&#012;    dnsauth2.sys.gtei.net&#012;    dnsauth1.sys.gtei.net&#012; &#012; &#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block--><br>The reason that the 4.2.2.x DNS servers are frequently referred to as Level3 servers is that the IP NetRange/CIDR is owned by Level3.<br><br><pre class="brush: text">whois 4.2.2.1&#012; &#012;OrgName:    Level 3 Communications, Inc. &#012;OrgID:      LVLT&#012;Address:    1025 Eldorado Blvd.&#012;City:       Broomfield&#012;StateProv:  CO&#012;PostalCode: 80021&#012;Country:    US&#012;NetRange:   4.0.0.0 - 4.255.255.255 &#012;CIDR:       4.0.0.0/8 &#012;NetName:    LVLT-ORG-4-8&#012;NetHandle:  NET-4-0-0-0-1&#012;Parent:     &#012;NetType:    Direct Allocation&#012;NameServer: NS1.LEVEL3.NET&#012;NameServer: NS2.LEVEL3.NET&#012;Comment:    &#012;RegDate:    &#012;Updated:    2004-06-04&#012;OrgAbuseHandle: APL8-ARIN&#012;OrgAbuseName:   Abuse POC LVLT &#012;OrgAbusePhone:  +1-877-453-8353&#012;OrgAbuseEmail:  abuse@level3.com&#012;OrgTechHandle: ARINC4-ARIN&#012;OrgTechName:   ARIN Contact &#012;OrgTechPhone:  +1-800-436-8489&#012;OrgTechEmail:  arin-contact@genuity.com&#012;OrgTechHandle: TPL1-ARIN&#012;OrgTechName:   Tech POC LVLT &#012;OrgTechPhone:  +1-877-453-8353&#012;OrgTechEmail:  ipaddressing@level3.com&#012; &#012; &#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block--><small>--<br>History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.<br>-- Dwight D. Eisenhower<br><A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net">Test your firewall.</a><br><A HREF="http://nature-pics.com">Smell the flowers.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21408033</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:34:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407607</link>
<description><![CDATA[kieranmullen posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/856374" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=856374');">jester121</a>:</small><br><br>No clue about that, we run our own internal DNS. The thing is that Level 3's 4.2.2.x servers aren't "officially" open to the public like OpenDNS ones are, they've just been around forever and easy to remember. I use them occasionally for troubleshooting or if I need to go to an ISP website to fix someone's computer...<br> </div>They are the servers that are used for Verizon Fios Setup too! I wonder if they have some sort of agreement with them. Simply typing DNS in the help section of Verizon.net did not yield any results except for a dial up dns server.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407607</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:59:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407541</link>
<description><![CDATA[jester121 posted : No clue about that, we run our own internal DNS. The thing is that Level 3's 4.2.2.x servers aren't "officially" open to the public like OpenDNS ones are, they've just been around forever and easy to remember. I use them occasionally for troubleshooting or if I need to go to an ISP website to fix someone's computer...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407541</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407535</link>
<description><![CDATA[backfeed posted : I am using Open DNS now on my networks, I have used Level 3's in a pinch, but I always thought that it was wrong to use them as a standard.  They do work good, but I am really surprised that they have left them open to the public for so long...<br><small>--<br>There is 10 types of people.  Those whom can read Binary and those who cannot.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407535</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:45:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407327</link>
<description><![CDATA[kieranmullen posted : Is it considered sloppy to put clients on OpenDNS rather than their ISP's dns?  I mean OpenDNS has so many other nice options as far as filtering goes as well and the ads are not a big turnoff.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/856374" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=856374');">jester121</a>:</small><br><br>Level 3 mentioned in passing (about the time the details on the cache poisoning proof of concept came out) that they would eventually be shutting off public access to their beloved and ubiquitous 4.2.2.x DNS servers. <br><br>That will be a very interesting day in the IT field, when we learn who's sloppy and who's not.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407327</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:11:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407162</link>
<description><![CDATA[jester121 posted : Level 3 mentioned in passing (about the time the details on the cache poisoning proof of concept came out) that they would eventually be shutting off public access to their beloved and ubiquitous 4.2.2.x DNS servers. <br><br>That will be a very interesting day in the IT field, when we learn who's sloppy and who's not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21407162</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:35:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406691</link>
<description><![CDATA[baineschile posted : Obviously there are plenty of alternatives, most which are safe. I just saw such an increase in page loading and java when i switched to OPEN DNS]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406691</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:05:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406650</link>
<description><![CDATA[jlivingood posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1030204" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1030204');">NetFixer</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1550577" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1550577');">baineschile</a>:</small><br><br>The only way to go.<br> </div>                                                             <br>OpenDNS is certainly <b>ONE</b> solution, but it is definitely <b>NOT</b> the <b>ONLY</b> solution.  :uhh:<br><br>In fact, the DNS servers used by your ISP (Comcast) are also immune to the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability referred to in the article.<br> </div>That is correct.  <br><br>Jason<br><small>--<br>JL<br>Comcast</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406650</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:56:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406634</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob_ posted : there's also<br><br>4.2.2.2<br>4.2.2.3 which are level 3 hosted DNS sites. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406634</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:52:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406584</link>
<description><![CDATA[NetFixer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1550577" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1550577');">baineschile</a>:</small><br><br>The only way to go.<br> </div>                                                             <br>OpenDNS is certainly <b>ONE</b> solution, but it is definitely <b>NOT</b> the <b>ONLY</b> solution.  :uhh:<br><br>In fact, the DNS servers used by your ISP (Comcast) are also immune to the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability referred to in the article.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by Dan Kaminsky :</small><br><br>I do think Nominum, and ComCast by extension, need some credit for working to develop more intensive protections against this attack...<br><br>It's not every day that Comcast and I are on the same side of the fence (ahem, net neutrality). This is however a much graver threat, and frankly more ISP's need to follow Comcast's lead here (now there are words I never thought I'd write!).<br> </div><small>--<br>History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.<br>-- Dwight D. Eisenhower<br><A HREF="http://portscan.dcs-net.net">Test your firewall.</a><br><A HREF="http://nature-pics.com">Smell the flowers.</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OpeNDNS-21406584</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:42:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>OpeNDNS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/OpeNDNS-21406472</link>
<description><![CDATA[baineschile posted : The only way to go.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/OpeNDNS-21406472</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

