bender
Bite my shiny metal ass
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL
clubs: | with speeds like these... is that 100Mbps symmetrical? or is it 100Mbps down/ 512Kbps up? | |
|
 
aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA | Re: with speeds like these... It won't be symmetrical on cable. | |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
| said by bender  :is that 100Mbps symmetrical? or is it 100Mbps down/ 512Kbps up? Most cable companies don't seem to be channel bonding on the upstream when using DOCSIS 3. More of a configuration/capacity headache.
Upgrading all fiber nodes and amplifiers for more upstream mhz is expensive, not to mention knocking out analog CATV Ready channels 1-6 by converting them to upstream. | |
|
 | 
CLoud67
@tmodns.net | Re: with speeds like these... Upstream D3 is not standardized yet | |
|
Joe12345678
join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL | up to 100Mbps per node? per tap? how many people can hit 100mbps per head end? per node? per tap? | |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | the death of analog cable is coming, cable is the only pay TV service that doesnt require STBs for every set.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
|
bender
Bite my shiny metal ass
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL
clubs: | Re: with speeds like these... i dont know if i'm alone here but i dont necessarily like the whole stb setup. personally i like the idea of being able to hook up as i can w/o paying per box. but thats pry just me. | |
|
jgegner
join:2007-12-17
Bowling Green, KY
 ·Insight Communicat..
1 edit | said by bender :is that 100Mbps symmetrical? or is it 100Mbps down/ 512Kbps up? No, it definitely won't be symmetrical. To me, though, 100Mbps down/10Mbps up sounds more realistic than 100Mbps down/512Kbps up.
James | |
|
|
|
|
