<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>cap done sort of right in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21409693</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: cap done sort of right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21412323</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1381016"><b>Lazlow</b></A> : If they really have to cap(ISPs in general), then this is a better way to go.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21412323</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:30:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>cap done sort of right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21409693</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : Ok their caps are really low but at least they offer cap free times unlike TW, Comcast and at&t and they don't charge for overage they just throttle back speed which makes sense if your supposed argument for caps in the first place is bandwidth management.<br><br>I wonder when wildblue is going to offer cap free times. Yes WB caps have been a bit more generous than Hughesnet, but not when you factor in 5 cap free hours. Cellular companies should take note of this too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21409693</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:11:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
