 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
 ·Frontier FiOS
| reply to Matt
Re: Yep, we've been saying it for years Comcast's VoIP isn't in the same class as a traditional VoIP provider if I understand their setup correctly. Comcast has their own network for routing calls over so they can give a higher priority/better connection. With Vonage & friends, you are at the mercy of the internet backbones and congestion.
I think it's a valid comparison as it's technically VoIP and not traditional POTS, but not 100% the same type of service. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Armstrong Zoom ..
| I am not sure with Comcast, but when I designed cable networks (4 years ago) we provided a Cisco router with 2 phone out jacks. Then, over a completely separate protocol (not IP) we pulled that voice over the copper in a way that no matter what the internet did the voice went right to the headend. The voice was even on a different channel.
So I really do not consider Comcast as VOIP voice services, even thought I do not know there design. Reason being is voice services, from what I have seen, are not over IP, in cable plants.
Also, voice circuits at the headend are given different priority and setup than say a T1 or whatever.
It just makes no sense to compare apples to oranges here. They are not the same service. Vonage and buddies all have a lot more challenges than a local call on a local network like Comcast. To me it is like saying Fios phone service is the same as VOIP. Or POTS is the same as cell service. |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by keyboard5684:It just makes no sense to compare apples to oranges here. They are not the same service. Vonage and buddies all have a lot more challenges than a local call on a local network like Comcast. To me it is like saying Fios phone service is the same as VOIP. Or POTS is the same as cell service. Again, it makes perfect sense because all the products you mention are in direct competition with each other. |
|
