 Jodokast96Stupid people really piss me off.Premium
join:2005-11-23
Erial, NJ
kudos:2 | reply to amigo_boy
Re: Global Crossing & Hurricane Electric looked other way ?? Ah, them not having the right to send it is not the same as you having the right to not have it sent. |
|
Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
1 edit | said by Jodokast96:Ah, them not having the right to send it is not the same as you having the right to not have it sent. Did you read what I wrote? You have the right to file Form 1500, which can lead to law enforcement action if the sender continues to mail you.
At a bare minimum you could sue the sender in your jurisdiction's Small Claims court, probably receiving a default judgment (because the offender wouldn't travel to defend themselves against what is indefensible.). After you have a few of those judgments, sell them to collection agencies for 50 cents on the dollar.
Mark |
|
| but that does not mean E-Mail. Postal mail and email are two different things. And as we seen here before from one other state not too long ago it is a persons right to send SPAM in one state. Right to free speech. |
|
Reviews:
·magicjack.com
| I agree. But, I didn't say email. What I said is, if the EFF is going to sue telcos (when the law specifically grants telcos immunity when participating with the executive branch), why wouldn't they sue spammers when we already have a Supreme Court ruling from 1970 which *screams* applicability to the electronic age?
It would certainly have much more practical and tangible effect than nebulous damages of my email being *lawfully* snooped.
Mark |
|
