| Why have .gov provide the infrastructure? Oh look the government provides us with roads.... They also tell you what you can and can't do on those roads. You will all be bitching when they won't allow certain things on their pipe. If they don't like something being passed along on their network they will stop it, EVEN IF A THIRD PARTY PROVIDES YOU WITH SERVICE. |
|
1 edit | Ummm, is this not what companies are doing already?
Under government, it will be controlled by the people as long as coruption of government does not happen. Also it seems more governments are moving toward accountability. Politicans are being nailed. Seems that government will be siding with their people more and more. The way it should be. |
|
| Ummmm, more governments are moving toward censorship. I believe it is Australia that has just started censoring some traffic in their country (in the last couple weeks). I Don't recall the specifics. China is another glaring example of government censorship.
The fact that the government would have a monopoly on the network, should be enough to scare you away. |
|
| If you look who is in power then you will understand how this happened.
This is against everyone in the nation basicly and the government gets its cues from unions and selected interests. The ALP party under this administration has stepped closer to the far left and with beliefs of the far right in mind.
ALP is no longer a Workers Party but a vested interest party. |
|
 KoolMoeAw ManPremium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD | reply to Fire735
There wouldn't be a difference. If the FedGov wanted the 'internet' censored to some degree now, you think AT&T, VZ, Comcast, etc would fight it? I have strong doubts.
KM |
|
