site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


cpsycho

join:2008-06-03
HarperLand

1 edit

reply to Fire735

Re: Why have .gov provide the infrastructure?

Ummm, is this not what companies are doing already?

Under government, it will be controlled by the people as long as coruption of government does not happen. Also it seems more governments are moving toward accountability. Politicans are being nailed. Seems that government will be siding with their people more and more. The way it should be.


Fire735

@starband.net

Ummmm, more governments are moving toward censorship. I believe it is Australia that has just started censoring some traffic in their country (in the last couple weeks). I Don't recall the specifics. China is another glaring example of government censorship.

The fact that the government would have a monopoly on the network, should be enough to scare you away.



cpsycho

join:2008-06-03
HarperLand

If you look who is in power then you will understand how this happened.

This is against everyone in the nation basicly and the government gets its cues from unions and selected interests. The ALP party under this administration has stepped closer to the far left and with beliefs of the far right in mind.

ALP is no longer a Workers Party but a vested interest party.



KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD

reply to Fire735
There wouldn't be a difference. If the FedGov wanted the 'internet' censored to some degree now, you think AT&T, VZ, Comcast, etc would fight it? I have strong doubts.
KM


Thursday, 31-May 22:03:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics