MacThrasher
Please replace user and reboot.
Premium
join:2002-04-26
Chagrin Falls, OH
clubs:  
 ·AT&T Midwest
 ·DIRECTV
| reply to KrK
Re: I agree with the idea of Network Neutrality in general....
said by KrK  :In other words, this is a serious issue, and I don't think Congress can touch it without screwing it up. That is my fear too. I find this to be more of a "profit" capacity rather than "bandwidth" capacity. The just want to be content providers as well as ISP's. But, when in Rome...
--
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.  • Never Forget. • Your Tropical Retreat from the stress of Jihad. |
|
LegoPower77
Abecedarian
Premium
join:2002-08-03
Arlington, VA
| reply to KrK
And there's the proverbial fly in the ointment. Politicians and bureaucrats act in their own self interest just like any corporate CEO, it's just the incentives are different. Government oversight and planning boards are open to corruption and rent-seeking just as much as corporate boardrooms (I would say even more).
It's like an economics professor I had used to say and I think applies here mutatis mutandis: if you want to get money out of politics, you have to get politics out of money. |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| ... however I worry that the Government's attempt to "enforce" it will actually be controlled by lobbyists and that once a "rule" or "law" is in effect it will actually provide great wiggle-room for Neutrality to NOT be enforceable.... In other words, this is a serious issue, and I don't think Congress can touch it without screwing it up.
I surely hope I'm wrong.... :/
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
