KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to amigo_boy
Re: The idea is good, reduce traffic and bandwidth usages
said by amigo_boy  :Maybe that threat will keep them honest? I think they'll roll out P4P as the "Supported" peer to peer standard and then declare the "old" P2P as a violation of TOS, etc and therefore justify "Network management techniques" to block/filter/reset "old school" P2P. Problem is, almost certainly the "new" peer to peer standard will come with built in baggage like DRM or etc
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
SilverSurfer
join:2007-08-19
| reply to amigo_boy
said by amigo_boy :said by KrK :and force users back to un-gimped P2P applications. Maybe that threat will keep them honest? You mean in the same manner that ISPs are so "honest"? LMAO. You're living in a dream world. |
|
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
 ·magicjack.com
| reply to KrK
said by KrK :and force users back to un-gimped P2P applications. Maybe that threat will keep them honest?
Is P4P an open standard? Will P2P client authors be able to create P4P clients?
I downloaded Ubuntu 8.10 a couple weeks ago. I left my computer on all weekend, serving 16 copies for the 2 I downloaded. Occasionally I looked at the peers that were connecting to me. They were from New Zealand, China, Brazil.
That didn't seem too efficient when, I bet, they could have used distance to choose better peer arrangements.
Mark |
|
