FunnyBones
Premium
join:2004-01-22
usa
 ·Vonage
1 edit | Network Neutrality Is bad
I feel like I'm going to beat a dead horse but here is why network neutrality is bad. First this was planned long ago to kill out what we now know as the internet and for people who may have forgot "Information Operations Roadmap" »www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSA···dmap.pdf
Then you have to look at internet clogging and how they keep saying video is what is clogging up the tubes but wait a minute how could that be when most videos like youtube is on its own server?
I can tell you what secret you all been missing they do not want us to have free speech and webpages like youtube we can expose who they are and the crap they pull.
I think people forget how they wanted to charge you for each email you send with credit stamps or even wanted to start over so they could track all that you do »web.archive.org/web/200704170439···,00.html
The system will be controlled in some form but the real question is will you still drink the kool-aid? But never forget many have wanted to snoop »news.cnet.com/Congress%20may%20c···as.email
--
Are you part of the cattle? |
|
pixfoo
@comcast.net | You might want to re-read the definition of Network Neutrality. |
|
FunnyBones
Premium
join:2004-01-22
usa
·Vonage
1 edit | said by pixfoo :
You might want to re-read the definition of Network Neutrality.
I know what it means but it is also a scam and why do you think isps have caps? or illegal block traffic?
This is sort of a scam that they hold with their companies and can do what they want so any definition to me is pointless.
All it really is a few words to make you feel all warm and fuzzy but notice how when you dont give in you get put under a cap. They will have control in some form or another so as I said network neutrality is a scam.
--
Are you part of the cattle? |
|
sivran
Long Live The Suite
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
clubs:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| So... you want a walled-garden internet, where anyone outside your ISP's network has to pay your ISP (not their ISP, yours) to reach you (and be reached by you, which you'll also pay extra for).
There is a company that tried that, actually. It was called America Online. Their model failed, imploding spectacularly with the arrival of cheap dial-up, and ultimately cheap broadband. Now they scrape by, attempting to compete with Google.
If you still want that, you could see if AOL still sells dial-up in your area, and switch to them. Then use only their software and never leave its boundaries, nor click any button that might lead outside the warm and fuzzy AOL server farm in Virginia.
As for me, no thanks. I'll continue supporting neutrality.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon profitable cause... |
|
FunnyBones
Premium
join:2004-01-22
usa
·Vonage
| I never said I don't support it sivran but what I said was that it is a scam and you can argue semantics all day long but with network neutrality you will pay the price by having caps and other crap the isp will force on you so I guess if I'm going to blunt it is a win win for isp's anyway you go.
--
Are you part of the cattle? |
|
