<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: More importantly in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r2142421</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:18:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:18:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: More importantly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2151121</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219493"><b>2farfromCO7</b></A> : Well then Farmington Hills must be bucking the trend because our broadband access sucks big time, thanks to the bastards at Time Warner Cable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2151121</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:36:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: More importantly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2142421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/365300"><b>nc1165</b></A> : According to <A HREF="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/GoodMorningAmerica/GMA0203Americas_fattest_cities.html" >ABC</A> news and Good Morning America, it wouldn't kill Detroit to get out from behind that PC monitor and take a walk:<br><br>"Among "fat cities," Houston ranks No. 1, followed by Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia and Dallas, according to results released this morning on Good Morning America."<br><br>I wonder if there is a direct link between broadband internet users and obesity?<br><small>--<br>If my enemy cuts me, I will drown him in my own blood.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2142421</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:38:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>More importantly</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2142015</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219493"><b>2farfromCO7</b></A> : They are only choosing to have competiton in cities that they have the largest customer base in.  Time Warner currently charges up to $85/month for cable modems in Farmington Hill, MI.  Allowing a competing ISP would mean people could get satellite for TV saving them over 20% a month and cable modems for $40/month.  Time Warner can survive like that in their bigger cities, but not in clusters of just 4 suburbs.  There overhead is way too high.  This is why "Open Access" is a fraud.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2142015</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:44:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
