<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Deep Packet Inspection in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21428220</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:09:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:09:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Deep Packet Inspection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21428220</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <br>... there's a growing push in the States to use Deep Packet Inspection to monitor each and every packet you send and receive for legality.<br><br><br>That push would necessitate rewriting CALEA among other statutes.<br><br>CALEA, as instituted places strict limitations upon what an ISP can look at, even on his own network.<br><br>It is illegal for an ISP to do deep packet inspection, even on his own customers, without a subpoena or CALEA action.<br><br>The only exception is monitoring for maintenance purposes.  Traffic shaping would be "maintenance" purposes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21428220</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:58:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
