republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


sivran
Back to Opera again
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to FunnyBones

Re: Network Neutrality Is bad

So... you want a walled-garden internet, where anyone outside your ISP's network has to pay your ISP (not their ISP, yours) to reach you (and be reached by you, which you'll also pay extra for).

There is a company that tried that, actually. It was called America Online. Their model failed, imploding spectacularly with the arrival of cheap dial-up, and ultimately cheap broadband. Now they scrape by, attempting to compete with Google.

If you still want that, you could see if AOL still sells dial-up in your area, and switch to them. Then use only their software and never leave its boundaries, nor click any button that might lead outside the warm and fuzzy AOL server farm in Virginia.

As for me, no thanks. I'll continue supporting neutrality.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon profitable cause...


FunnyBones
Premium
join:2004-01-22
usa
kudos:1

I never said I don't support it sivran but what I said was that it is a scam and you can argue semantics all day long but with network neutrality you will pay the price by having caps and other crap the isp will force on you so I guess if I'm going to blunt it is a win win for isp's anyway you go.
--
Are you part of the cattle?


Thursday, 31-May 16:20:55 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics