site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


sivran
Back to Opera again
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to T1 Rocky

Re: Capping is not non-neutrality cause it is the same for all..

I think you misunderstand.

quote:
What would stop it? What would stop AT&T from telling ebay that they had to pay AT&T one cent everytime an AT&T customer visited ebay? If ebay says that is unacceptable then AT&T can block ebay's traffic.
Why, network neutrality would! That's the point. Your example is of a lack of neutrality, the very thing network neutrality proponents want to prevent.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon profitable cause...

SuperWISP

join:2007-04-17
Laramie, WY

An alarmist attempt to grab attention

No; antitrust law would. "Network neutrality" is an attempt to (among other things) prohibit ISPs from charging a fair price for what they deliver. If a service costs more for the ISP to provide, it is entitled to charge more. Plain and simple. Trying to legislate getting something for nothing is not only insane; it's unconstitutional.

Thursday, 31-May 16:20:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics