<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>AT&#x26;T is dumping Wimax in Nevada in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21440196</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:16:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:16:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is dumping Wimax in Nevada</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21444419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : If you had WiMAX for the past 2 years it wasn't the IEEE 802.16e-based WiMAX gear but was based on the older 802.16d "fixed" standard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21444419</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:41:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;T is dumping Wimax in Nevada</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21440196</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/453991"><b>twodogs</b></A> : We have had AT&T Wimax here in Pahrump, NV (outside of Las Vegas) for the last two years, and they are pulling the plug on it as of 12/31/08, replacing it with DSL. AT&T has been busy adding RT's all around town. All I can say after having both, is that under AT&T implementation, there is no comparison, Wimax was very, very slow, but it still did beat the alternative...<br><small>--<br>Madness takes its toll...Please have exact change ready !</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21440196</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:19:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
