I suppose ^ that might be true to some extent, but certainly anyone who has ever paid for Bell services is qualified to write a review.
jj_frap, above, has it right. The THOUSANDS of other posters here who review an ISP once they have left are also correct. I invite you to read their statements. You will start to notice some shocking parallels - not the least of which is that many of them are written in the past tense. Fear not! They don't tend to use too many big words. Begin:
lol this is what you did the last time when you got "told". Maybe u should be "told" again for making reviews for a company you haven't been with in... in.... how long has it been now?
So far, no one has "told" me anything about anything. Why don't you go ahead? Show me what for.
It's been a blissful 10 months since I left Symp. Though I still had Bell telephone when I first wrote this brief review, I don't use them any longer. Hence my need to come here and adjust my write-up.
Actually, I'll nix the ADQ part and just assume that your critic is a fundie: His writing style suggests that English is his native language, so it's not logically possible that be backs the ADQ.
Incidentally, I was in Gatineau (Hull borough) this past Friday and saw a fair number of Quebec Solidaire signs. Any chance that they'll pick up some PQ ridings in Eastern Montreal?
·
·