| reply to any news
Re: Any news in regards to forced wholesale B/W changes by Bell? K found it:
direct link: »Re: Acanac
Full topic where its found: »Acanac
scroll down a few posts.
This wasn't in regards to adsl2+.
For ADSL2+ Bell wanted them to offer no better b/w than what bell currently offers their own customers for around the same price.
It was 2 different things. |
|
Reviews:
 ·NBTel now Aliant
| said by any news :K found it: direct link: » Re: AcanacFull topic where its found: » Acanacscroll down a few posts. This wasn't in regards to adsl2+. For ADSL2+ Bell wanted them to offer no better b/w than what bell currently offers their own customers for around the same price. It was 2 different things. In a way, it negates all the superb efforts and investment that TSI has put in their network to account for a true neutral network. I hope this crap never falls through! |
|
| reply to any news
said by any news :
For ADSL2+ Bell wanted them to offer no better b/w than what bell currently offers their own customers for around the same price.
isn't this kinda illegal, it make me think of the oil compagny (ultramar..etc) in the Sherbrooke region, that were calling each other up to fix gas price
they would raise their price all at the same time for a predetermined price, now they are facing the justice,
i think ultramar pleaded guilty |
|
 mazhurgPremium
join:2004-05-02
Portage La Prairie, MB | It's only illegal if they collude to price fix. Companies can partner and agree to offer the same product. They just can't agree to the same product and same price.
IMHO anyway. But then, lots to learn every day! |
|
| said by mazhurg:It's only illegal if they collude to price fix. Yeah. And try and prove that bewteen Bell, Rogers and Teksavvy.
What will the competition bureau do? Contact Bell to put a wire tap on a Bell executive?
[insert insane laff here] |
|
