Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » TekSavvy » We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1771
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Availability Contradictions? »
« Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

chronoss2009

join:2008-09-23
·TekSavvy Solutions..


3 edits
reply to Sempronius
Re: We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC

better look up impede
it also means that your attempting to slow or obfusicate
it means that your putting a 250 pound football blocker in front a me with the football, i have to find a way around that takes time

there is no other way i get stopped or am frustrated to not bother or get tackled

what would you call me running at 675 miles an hour and hten hitting the blocker and after words he holds on and i get only 25Kbytes to the goal line?

YUP both fit the category bud
and just cause the trucks are blocked doe shtat mean you cant empty the contents and find a way into paris NO , it just means your not going to drive in fast are you now.

SO english lesson for the day is concluded.
elecoya = football blocker
MLPPP = the hail marry past him
Sftp = a side throw to open runner/however upspeed is impeded

The goal i really htink as Microsoft is there partner and they signed that little pact with the mpaa/riaa , is to limit canadian internet so bad that the old model gets traction again.

Do not think im going to ever buy a cdr again , or dvdr.
The levy was your last best hope for peace.

Just wait till the copyright law drops and gets enacted and millions start getting massive fines ( is this the harper plan to stay out of the red? )
Impede
Verb 1. impede - be a hindrance or obstacle to; "She is impeding the progress of our project"
"Bell is impeding the progress of my download"
2. impede - block passage through; "obstruct the path"
(this section is even worse you get prevented and STOPPED)
however smart person that gets stopped will find ways.
AND have a look at #2 the last two near bottom seems to also mean same as 1
That is blocking buddy
if you impede my path it is thereby blocked
no matter which you try and use you get pwned by the fact it IS BLOCKING.
»www.thefreedictionary.com/impede

and if they get away with an impedament today, tomorrow its full on. A wise man would say stop now and prevent the cost to taxpayers tomorrow. That kind a man gets respect formthe people of canada, he shows forward thinking. He shows direction and compassion to real people. He would do as a better politician then what we have.


MarkAW
Barry White or lil bratt
Premium
join:2001-08-27
Canada
·Bell Sympatico
·Cogeco Cable


1 edit
reply to Stewy
said by Stewy See Profile :

"the CRTC's vice-chairman said Thursday after the federal watchdog ruled Bell Canada was not breaking laws by slowing down certain uses of the internet."

more proof that the CRTC is in Bell's pocket
"CBCNews.ca:Some critics have personally attacked you as you spent 17 years working for Rogers and 11 for Bell. How do you respond to those critics?
»www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008···qna.html

Great question, and it points to the crux of the problem with CRTC governance. And Leonard Katz's response completely dodges the question."

If the CRTC is presumed to be representing the best interests of the Canadian public, how is it acceptable for the vice-chairman to have a combined 28 year history working for the two biggest private telecom companies? You cannot expect objective decision-making with such a high potential for direct or indirect personal benefit. All taxpayers should be deeply concerned about the structure and culture of the CRTC.
--
Do you ever get the feeling that the only reason we have elections is to find out if the polls were right?

The man who knows how will always have a job. The man who also knows why will always be his boss.

cbp

join:2005-11-24
Montreal, QC

reply to Sempronius
"Katz: It was mainly based on whether discrimination was going on[...] there was no discrimination here[...]"

Uhh... What? No discrimination you say?

I say there is. There is a discrimination in here.

Let us assign colors to people that use the internet.
Let's say that people using P2P, watching online streaming are assigned the color black.
Now let use assign the color white to people that just read their emails and know nothing about computers.

During peak hours, white people get to use the internet at full speed, speed that they don't necessarily need. All this time, black people are beat down into submission and are allowed only dial-up speeds. Both pay the same price for what should be the same thing.

Back to reality. Customers are discriminated not on their service status (wholesalers, resellers, Joe 6 pack) but on their usage habits (the programs/protocols that they use).

In order NOT to have discrimination, ALL users should throttled for all applications/protocols.


LucyintheSky

@teksavvy.com
reply to Sempronius
Holy $hit..the CBC took out the part (i.e. censored) where Katz is taken to task about his previous liasons with Bell.

Color me surprised.


MarkAW
Barry White or lil bratt
Premium
join:2001-08-27
Canada
·Bell Sympatico
·Cogeco Cable

said by LucyintheSky :

Holy $hit..the CBC took out the part (i.e. censored) where Katz is taken to task about his previous liasons with Bell.

Color me surprised.
HEh! they did to. May be the CBC is now on the CRTC's side.

What was asked and put in the article this morning; "CBCNews.ca:Some critics have personally attacked you as you spent 17 years working for Rogers and 11 for Bell. How do you respond to those critics?

What they changed it to; "CBCNews.ca: There have already been some personal attacks on CRTC staffers, saying these people work for and are in league with Bell. What do you say about that?"
--
Do you ever get the feeling that the only reason we have elections is to find out if the polls were right?

The man who knows how will always have a job. The man who also knows why will always be his boss.
-
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » TekSavvyAvailability Contradictions? »
« Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling  
page: 1 · 2


Friday, 27-Nov 14:57:53 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]